Page 331 -
P. 331

LIME SOFTENING                     11.11

         Correcting for purity gives

                      CaO  =  1,899  =  2,110 lb commercial lime/mil gal
                             0.9
         Adding selected design factor of  10% for minimum feeder  size gives

              1.1(2,110 lb commercial lime/mil gal)  =  2,320 lb/mil gal commercial lime
         Approx.  resulting hardness =  35(approx.  minimum solubility Ca)  +  10(approx.
                  minimum solubility of Mg  as CaCO3)  +  81(NCH)  =  126 mg/L as CaCO3~

         Approx.  remaining alkalinity =  45  mg/L as CaCO3
                                 (approx. minimum solubility of Ca plus Mg  as CaCo3)~

        Using Equations (11.19)  and (11.21) for approximate CO2 feed requirements gives
        CO2 (lb/mil gal)  =  3.7(40 mg/L bicarbonate alkalinity)
                                              +  3.7(65  mg/L excess  OH alkalinity)
                     =  389 lb/mil gal
        Adding selected design factor of  10% for minimum feeder size gives
                          1.1(389 lb/mil gal)  =  428 lb/mil gal CO2


        EXAMPLE 11.4  Reduce the noncarbonate hardness for the water shown in Example  11.3
        enough to reach  a target finished water hardness of  100 mg/L.
           The required lime dosage is calculated as in Example  11.3.
                 Noncarbonate hardness to be removed =  126 -  100 =  26 mg/L
                 Noncarbonate hardness to be left in water  =  81  -  26  =  55 mg/L
        Using Equation (11.10) to estimate soda ash feed requirements gives

               Soda ash (lb/mil gal)  =  8.8(NCH  -  x) =  8.8(81  -  55)  =  229  lb/mil gal
        Adding selected design factor of  10% for minimum feeder size yields
                            1.1(229 lb/mil gal)  =  252  lb/mil gal
          Approx.  resulting hardness  =  35(approx.  minimum solubility Ca)
                  +  10(approx.  minimum solubility of Mg  as CaCO3)  +  55(remaining NCH)
                              =  100 mg/L as CaCO3~




          tNote: Results are approximations based on theoretical equilibrium conditions.  These conditions are seldom du-
         plicated in practice and some variations should be expected  at the particular plant,
   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336