Page 145 - 3D Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites
P. 145

134                   30 Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites

                 the  shortcomings of  conventional sandwich composites, which  consist  of  two  thin
                 laminate face skins that are adhesively bonded to a light-weight core of honeycomb or
                 rigid foam.  The disadvantages of standard sandwich materials is that the manufacturing
                 process can be labour intensive because the skins must be manufactured separately and
                 then  bonded  to  the  core  in  a  second  processing  step.  Consequently,  sandwich
                 composites can be expensive to manufacture for low-cost applications such as civil and
                 marine  structures.  Further  problems  with  sandwich  composites are  that  they  are
                 susceptible to  skin-to-core separation  due  to  bond-line  defects and  experience skin
                 delamination under excessive bending, buckling or impact loads.
                    Advanced  sandwich composites made  of  distance  fabric  offer  the  potential  to
                 overcome these problems.  The 3D  fibre architecture of  a  distance fabric is  shown
                 schematically in Figure 2.1 1, and is characterised by through-thickness fibres, known as
                 piles, interconnecting two woven face skins.  The fabric is produced using the velvet
                 weaving process that is described in Chapter 2, and the process can be controlled to
                 produce  fabrics  with  different  amounts  and  orientations of  the  pile  yams.  After
                 weaving, the hollow core of the fabric can be filled with a polymer or syntactic foam by
                 liquid foam injection.  The skins can be impregnated with thermoset or thermoplastic
                 resin using the moulding processes outlined in Chapter 3.





                       10000 -
                                          2D Laminate
                              --------    3D Orthogonal Composite
                    N-             ...-
                     E  8000  _.......a.   0  3D Interlock Composite
                     E
                    Y
                     a
                     2
                     a,  6000-
                     tJ)
                     a
                     Em
                     2  4000-
                     kl
                     z
                     -
                        2000  -



                           0
                           100        150        200        250        300        350
                                              Impact Velocity (m/s)




                 Figure 5.25 Effect of impact velocity on the amount of delamination damage to 2D and
                 3D woven composites (Data from Billaut and Rousell, 1995).
   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150