Page 199 - Acquisition and Processing of Marine Seismic Data
P. 199

190                               3. NOISE IN MARINE SEISMICS

           offset) and negative (from far to near offset)  indicates that the shot involves moderate ampli-
           dips, respectively. The amplitude of the cable  tude cable noise in negative dip and relatively
           noise is dependent on the weather conditions,  low amplitude in positive dip. An application
           tow speed, balance of the streamer in the water,  of an f-k filter with a suitable f-k polygon almost
           efficiency of the stretch sections at both ends of  completely removes cable noise from the data
           the streamer, and concordance between lead-in  (Fig. 3.19B).
           cable and active sections (Larner et al., 1983).
           Application of too much gain or usage of unnec-  3.6.3 Direct Waves
           essarily low AGC operator lengths may increase
           the amplitudes of the cable noise.              Direct wavespropagatehorizontallyalongthe
              The amplitude of the noise is proportional to  sea surface from the source to hydrophones and
           the third order of the vessel speed, and if the ves-  are recorded by whole available channels, and
           sel speed is doubled, S/N decreases with a ratio  they are always the first arrivals at each channel.
           of 1/11. On the contrary, if we decrease the tow  Because they travel only in the water column,
           speed on the order of 18%, then the S/N will be  their propagation velocity always equals to the
           doubled (Schoenberger and Mifsud, 1974),     P wave velocity in the sea water (approximately
           which indicates that high tow speeds are not  1500 m/s). Their amplitude diminishes with
           practical for seismic acquisition. Noise test  increasing offset: It is maximum for the very first
           results obtained at 5.3 and 8.6 knot speeds using  recording channel while minimum amplitude is
           a streamer with no birds deployed show that  recorded at the farthest one.
           noise amplitudes do not increase or decrease    Fig. 3.20 shows direct waves on two filtered
           with the distance to the tow point, but they  shot gathers recorded at water depths of 90 and
           exhibit rather regular distribution along the  180 m, respectively. As the water depth increases,
           streamer, which suggests that the noise is pro-  the time between seabed reflection and the direct
           duced in a continuous manner within the      wave increases at all offsets. In fact, direct wave is
           streamer. In addition, the frequency content of  an asymptote to the seabed reflection merging at
           the noise does not change significantly with  infinite offset. Minimum offset distance in the
           the tow speed and only absolute amplitude    source-streamer layout can be verified using the
           increases (Schoenberger and Mifsud, 1974).   arrival time of the direct wave at the first channel
              The amplitude of the cable noise depends  of the streamer. By using the inclination of direct
           strongly on the vessel speed and it is signifi-  waves on the shot or CDP gathers, it is possible
           cantly reduced by collecting the data with an  to obtain P wave velocity along the surficial
           optimum tow speed. One can use f-k filters to  waters,whichisacrucialparameterforsomemul-
           remove the cable noise during the processing  tiple elimination methods.
           stage, because they are linear on the raw shot  It is not possible to avoid recording direct
           records, especially those with negative dip on  waves during the acquisition. However, they
           the shots. During the f-k filtering for the positive  always appear before the seabed reflection
           dip cable noise, however, extra attention should  hyperbola, which is the first meaningful signal
           be paid since their dip may coincide with those  carrying primary reflection information from
           of the primary reflection amplitudes, particu-  the seabed, and since direct wave is an asymp-
           larly at far offsets where the reflection hyperbo-  tote to the seabed reflection, they theoretically
           las becomes relatively linear. Fig. 3.19 shows an  never interfere. Therefore, the direct waves are
           example removal of the mechanical cable noise  generally not problematic for reflection seismic
           by an f-k filter. The f-k panel in Fig. 3.19A  studies and they can be eliminated using a
   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204