Page 384 - Acquisition and Processing of Marine Seismic Data
P. 384

7.2 PREDICTIVE DECONVOLUTION                        375
































           FIG. 7.10  (A) Amplitude attenuation rates of multiples for a range of prediction lag and operator length values.
           (B) A synthetic trace with one primary reflection (P) and its multiple (M) used for the analysis in (A). (C) The autocorrelogram
           of the synthetic trace in (B), indicating that the multiple period and time length of the wavelet are 100 and 28 ms, respectively.



           in Fig. 7.10C, the multiple period and time length  first-order multiple in the autocorrelation series.
           of the wavelet are 100 and 28 ms, respectively.  When the prediction lag exceeds the multiple
              Based on the analysis in Fig. 7.10A, the maxi-  period, multiple attenuation simply fails regard-
           mum attenuation in multiple amplitude is     lessoftheoperatorlength(Fig.7.10A).Asaresult,
           obtained when the prediction lag equals the mul-  operator length must be selected as close as pos-
           tiple period (100 ms) regardless of the operator  sible to the length of the source wavelet embed-
           length. Although the attenuation is not widely  ded in the data, and the prediction lag must
           affected by operator length, the decay in the mul-  equal to the multiple period which it is intended
           tiple amplitude slightly decreases for higher  tosuppress.Thetimelengthofthesourcewavelet
           operator lengths if the prediction lag is small  is the length ofthe firstisolatedenergypackagein
           (e.g., compare the decay curve of 36-ms operator  the autocorrelogram (Fig. 7.10C). If smaller, it
           length for a prediction lag range between 60 and  progressively corresponds to a deconvolution
           95 ms). In any case, the multiple suppression is  application for the temporal resolution improve-
           maximum when the prediction lag exactly equals  ment (Section 6.5). In any case, the prediction
           the multiple period. The multiple period is the  lag must not exceed the multiple period for a
           time span between the multiples in the seismo-  successful multiple elimination.
           gram and can be obtained by analyzing the auto-  Fig. 7.11 shows an analysis of multiple sup-
           correlogram of the input trace. Practically, the  pression by predictive deconvolution on a syn-
           multiple period equals the onset time of the  thetic minimum phase trace consisting of a
   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389