Page 386 - Acquisition and Processing of Marine Seismic Data
P. 386

7.2 PREDICTIVE DECONVOLUTION                        377

           primary reflection (P) at 200 ms and its two suc-  deconvolution can be applied one more time
           cessive multiples (M 1 and M 2 ) at 400 and 600 ms.  to remove the second-order multiple using a
           Outputs of the predictive deconvolution with  prediction lag of α ¼ 350 ms. In Fig. 7.12C, a
           corresponding amplitude spectra and autocor-  spiking deconvolution using n ¼ 100 ms and
           relation traces are computed for a range of pre-  α ¼ 2 ms is applied to the seismogram following
           diction lag values for a constant operator length  the  predictive  deconvolution  to  improve
           of n ¼ 100 ms. The periodic events such as mul-  the temporal resolution. Specifically, the first
           tiples in the input time series result in notches in  zero crossing time of the autocorrelogram
           the amplitude spectrum of the seismogram.    (α ¼ 6 ms) can also be used to improve the reso-
           Small prediction lags, such as α ¼ 20 ms, shorten  lution, which makes the data more band-limited
           the seismic wavelet and hence improve the res-  (Fig. 7.12D). The application order of predictive
           olution, yet do not contribute to the suppression  and spiking deconvolutions is changeable and
           of multiple amplitudes (Fig. 7.11). However,  either predictive or spiking deconvolution can
           deconvolution outputs for α ¼ 120 ms and     be applied first.
           α ¼ 350 ms indicate interesting results. For    Fig. 7.13 shows the effects of different opera-
           α ¼ 120 ms, the first-order multiple M 1 is  tor lengths and prediction lags on a precondi-
           completely removed by deconvolution, and     tioned real marine shot gather. Predictive
           there are almost no amplitudes for M 1 in the  deconvolution suppresses the amplitudes in
           autocorrelogram. For α ¼ 350 ms, on the other  the autocorrelograms in a specific gate between
           hand, second-order multiple M 2 is completely  (α) and (α + nΔt), where Δt is the sampling inter-
           suppressed. That is because the periods of the  val, and n is the operator length in time samples.
           first- and second-order multiples are 120 and  The time length of these gates is nΔt, indicated
           350 ms, respectively, indicated by T 1 and T 2 in  by double arrows in Fig. 7.13. For instance, in
           the autocorrelogram of the input seismogram.  the autocorrelograms of the predictive deconvo-
           If there are more than one order of multiples  lution output for n ¼ 40 ms and α ¼ 100 ms in
           in the data, periods of each individual multiples  Fig. 7.13, the amplitudes between 100 and
           in the autocorrelogram are used as prediction  140 ms are significantly suppressed. If the
           lag values and more than one predictive decon-  amplitudes corresponding to the multiple
           volution can be applied successively to the data,  reflections coincide with this gate, then almost
           each of which can suppress one individual    all of the multiple reflections are removed from
           multiple.                                    the shots. For the example shot in Fig. 7.13,
              In order to remove a source wavelet from the  n ¼ 80 ms and α ¼ 60 ms produce the best
           seismic trace, a spiking deconvolution can also  deconvolution result, since most of the multiple
           be applied following the predictive deconvolu-  energy (except that at the far offsets) are within
           tion. Fig. 7.12A shows the same synthetic    the gate.
           seismogram as in Fig. 7.11A. Fig. 7.12B illus-  In summary, prediction lag (α) must be longer
           trates its predictive deconvolution output for  than the time length of the first isolated energy
           n ¼ 100 ms and α ¼ 120 ms. Only primary and  in the input trace’s autocorrelogram. If not, some
           second-order multiple amplitudes exist in the  of the amplitudes in the autocorrelation corre-
           seismogram since the first-order multiple is  sponding to the seismic wavelet will be zeroed
           completely removed after predictive deconvolu-  out by deconvolution. In practice, the optimal
           tion. Amplitudes associated with the first-order  output is obtained when prediction lag equals
           multiple in the autocorrelogram are diminished,  the multiple period. Predictive deconvolution
           and the periodic notches in the amplitude    suppresses the amplitudes between (α) and
           spectrum disappear. If desired, predictive   (α + nΔt), and therefore it is preferred to set
   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391