Page 42 - Acquisition and Processing of Marine Seismic Data
P. 42

1.3 FUNDAMENTALS OF MARINE SEISMICS                    33


























           FIG. 1.22  Theoretical reflection hyperbolas obtained from (A) a single horizontal reflector model and (B) a single inclined
           reflector model. If the interface is horizontal, the recorded hyperbolas are symmetrical about the shot location, whereas it is
           asymmetrical in the case of an inclined interface and zero-offset time moves in an updip direction.

           require NMO times as high as possible to work  reflection events in the prestack data. In some
           properly.                                    cases in marine seismics, however, reflections
              The NMO time of a specific reflection hyper-  do not display hyperbolic moveout, especially
           bola increases with offset distance. Since long  in areas of rapid morphological changes.
           offsets provide higher NMO times for the reflec-  Fig. 1.24 shows a migrated section through a
           tion hyperbolas, longer streamer cables are pre-  steeply dipping continental slope crosscutting
           ferred during the acquisition of marine seismic  several morphological structures of submarine
           data. Maximum NMO time is also larger for    canyons in different scales with steeply dipping
           shallow reflections, and it decreases with   walls, which constitute morphological varia-
           increasing reflector depth (Fig. 1.23A). In addi-  tions both on the seafloor and within the subbot-
           tion, NMO time decreases as the propagation  tom sediments. Example shot gathers from
           velocity increases (Fig. 1.23B). In the real world,  different locations along the seismic line are also
           the velocity of the subbottom sediments com-  provided in Fig. 1.24 to analyze the effect of mor-
           monly increases with increasing reflector depth,  phological variations on the shape of the reflec-
           and therefore, as a combined effect of reflector  tion hyperbolas. Especially in areas where the
           depth and velocity, we can expect an overall  rough seafloor exists, reflection hyperbolas on
           decrease in the maximum NMO time for deeper  the shot gathers are distorted due to the multiva-
           reflection hyperbolas (Fig. 1.23C). These conse-  lued reflections from steep walls of the subma-
           quences restrict the quality of the velocity field  rine channels. In these areas, velocity analysis
           obtained from seismic data by velocity analysis,  does not provide accurate results and the quality
           which is discussed in Chapter 9.             of the stacking output is degraded since it is
              In seismic data processing, some crucial  impossible to flatten such reflection hyperbolas
           processing steps, such as NMO correction or  with an imperfect moveout during NMO
           velocity analysis, assume perfectly hyperbolic  correction.
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47