Page 463 - Acquisition and Processing of Marine Seismic Data
P. 463

454                                 9. VELOCITY ANALYSIS





















































           FIG. 9.28  Suitable selection of supergather locations based on the target structures in 2D and 3D cases. (A) Two regional
           highs (blue arrows) on a 2D seismic line require a denser distribution of velocity analysis locations (blue dashed lines) in the
           vicinity. (B) Structural map of a regional anticline from a 3D survey, and (C) 3D supergather locations (white dots) and velocity
           interpolation grid among these locations (solid lines). A denser 2D and 3D velocity grid around these target structures will
           provide a better representation of their velocity structure in the final 2D and 3D velocity fields.

           shows these two cases during picking with an  are picked, and vice versa for the multiple reflec-
           NMO correction option: reflections of primaries  tions in which the primaries are overcorrected
           are flattened while the multiples are under-  after NMO correction (Fig. 9.29B). This is partic-
           corrected  (e.g.,  they  are  still  hyperbolic,  ularly important in shallow water surveys
           Fig. 9.29A) when primary reflection enclosures  where the primary and multiple reflections are
   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468