Page 333 - Adsorbents fundamentals and applications
P. 333

318   SORBENTS FOR APPLICATIONS

                                 Table 10.7. Bond energies (expressed by energies of ad-
                                 sorption) of H atoms on surface sites on graphite (see
                                 Figure 10 for models used) from ab initio molecular orbital
                                 calculations

                                 Model                   Bond Energy (kcal/Mol)
                                 C (H on armchair edge)        −85.27
                                 D(Honzigzagedge)              −90.24
                                 E (H adjacent basal sites)    −27.04
                                 F (H on alternating basal sites)  −46.47
                                 Yang and Yang, 2002.


                     Model E, the energy drops from 46.47 kcal/mol (two H on alternate sites) to
                     27.04 kcal/mol (two H on adjacent sites).
                       Molecular orbital calculations have been published recently on the bonding
                     of F atoms (Seifert et al., 2000; Kudin et al., 2001) and H atoms (Bauschlicher,
                     2000 and 2001; Froudakis, 2001) on SWNT. Both Bauschlicher and Froudakis
                     studied the bonding of H atoms on the exterior wall of the SWNT (both con-
                     sisting of 200 C atoms, but with different diameters). Bauschlicher calculated
                     the bond energies for the tube with 1H and 2H and 24%, 50%, and 100% cov-
                     erages (assuming 1H/1C). The average C–H bond energy for the first H was
                     21.6 kcal/mol, and 40.6 kcal/mol for the first two H atoms. The average bond
                     energy for 50% coverage was 57.3 kcal/mol, decreasing to 38.6 kcal/mol for
                     100% coverage. Froudakis studied the bonding of 1H with the tube where the
                     H atom approached the tube wall in two ways: direct approach to the top of a
                     carbon atom, and approach along the centerline of a hexagon (Froudakis, 2001).
                     The energy minima were, respectively, 21 kcal/mol and 56 kcal/mol. Froudakis
                     also reported the C–C bond lengths in the nanotube after H bonding. With 16 H
                     bonded to 64 C on the 200-atom tube, the C–C bond length increased from
                     143 to 159 pm.
                       The C–H bond energies on the tube are in general agreement with that on the
                     basal plane of graphite. The energies on the basal plane are 46.47 kcal/mol for two
                     alternating or separated H atoms, and 27.04 kcal/mol for two adjacent H atoms. A
                     similar crowding effect was also seen on the curved tube, that is, 57.3 kcal/mol
                     for 50% coverage and 38.6 kcal/mol for 100% coverage. The increase in the
                     C–C bond lengths from 143 pm to 155–159 pm by adsorption of H was also
                     seen on the basal plane of graphite, and are, in fact, in excellent agreement with
                     the results of Yang and Yang (2002).
                       From the above comparison, it is unlikely that the adsorption of H atoms
                     would differ significantly on the basal plane of graphite and on the exterior wall
                     of the nanotube. Based on the results above, it is possible that the binding energies
                     could be lowered further for adsorption inside the tube. Also, no calculations have
                     been made on H atoms adsorbed between two layers of graphite at a d-spacing of
                     3.35 ˚ A. This could be the situation for hydrogen storage on GNF and MWNTs.
   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338