Page 187 - Adsorption, Ion Exchange & Catalysis- 2007, Elsevier - Copy
P. 187
Else_AIEC-INGLE_cH003.qxd 7/13/2006 1:46 PM Page 183
3.7 Three-Phase Fixed Beds: Trickle-Bed and Ped Bubble-Bed Reactors ack 183
eactor Axial dispersion in trickle-bed r s
f
The values of the axial dispersion coeficients in trickle beds are 1/3 – 1/6th those of the
liquid flow alone at the same Reynolds numbers. A correlation by Michell and Furzer is
available (Satterfield, 1975; Perry and Green, 1999):
Re L 0.7
2 0.32
Pe L 2 (3.417)
L dg p 3 L
where
2 0.44
0.68 Re 0.8 L 2 ad (3.418)
L 3 up
dg p
L
The Reynolds and Peclet numbers are based on the superficial liquid v whereas , elocity d p
and a u are expressed in cm and cm 2 /cm 3 , respecti. For gas-phase dispersions, the
ely
v
Hochman–Effron correlation is a 1975): v ield, ailable (Satterf
Pe Re 1.8 10 0.7 (3.419)
G G
where
0.005 Re L (3.420)
Here, the Reynolds and Peclet numbers are based on the superficial liquid v . This elocity
equation holds for 11 Re G 22 and 5 Re L 80.
Gas-phase dispersions hae also been found to be one or two orders of magnitude less v
,
than in single-phase gas flows. Normally in trickle beds, both phases are substantially in
plug flow (Perry and Green, 1999). According to Satterf the gas-phase disper- ield (1975),
sion is not ordinarily of concern in trickle-bed processing.
In trickle beds, the criterion of Mears can be used (Satterf 1975): ield,
Z 20 n C
ln i (3.421)
d p Pe L C o
where C i and C o are the feed and outlet concentrations, respecti and , v ely n , the reaction
order. This criterion gies the minimum v Z / d p ratio required to hold the reactor length
within 5% of that needed for plug flo . w