Page 494 - Advanced Design Examples of Seismic Retrofit of Structures
P. 494

Examples of Nonengineered Buildings Chapter  6 437

























             FIG. 6.36 Retrofitting steps by chicken wire with light steel strips. (A) Tying the mesh sheets.
             (B) Installation on wall with nails. (C) Cutting the mesh at unwanted locations. (D) Placing the thin
             steel strips with nails. (E) Placing the thick steel strips with nails. (F) Completed retrofit scheme.
             (Photos taken by Mohammad Yekrangnia.)


             installation of the layers on the wall by means of nails, cutting the nails with
             scissors at the intended locations (e.g., openings or ends of the walls), and place-
             ment of light steel strips at the intended locations which are connected to the
             walls by nails.
                A comparison of the implemented retrofit methods is provided in Table 6.7.
             As can be seen, using steel mesh is marginally cheaper and faster than the other
             methods. Also, because chicken wire requires considerable deformation to con-
             tribute in load-bearing, it is expected to provide integrity for the adobe blocks
             and prevent them from falling. As a result, this retrofit method can be regarded
             as a solution to the minimum requirement for retrofitting adobe buildings.

             Shaking Table Tests Two 2:3 scale specimens representing a common practice
             of dome-roof adobe buildings were tested on the shaking table. The first build-
             ing was the unretrofitted control specimen, and the other, exactly duplicating
             the first one, was retrofitted. The specimens consisted of four types of walls hav-
             ing various types of openings which were exactly duplicating the wall speci-
             mens in static cyclic tests in “Static-Cyclic Tests” section. The geometrical
             characteristics of the specimens are shown in Fig. 6.37.
                The longitudinal and transverse components of the 2005 Zarand earthquake,
             Chatrood Station, are chosen as input excitations of shaking table tests. The two
             input components were scaled up in an equal ratio so that peak ground accel-
             eration (PGA) of both components (in east-west direction) is scaled to 0.35g,
             entitled 100% as of design earthquake based on the Iranian Code of Practice
   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499