Page 114 - Advanced Gas Turbine Cycles
P. 114

Chapter 6. ‘Wet’ gas turbine plants           87

         In an experiment to determine the calorific value of the fuel at temperature To, and for
       the same fuel flow the steady flow energy equation would yield
            ha0 +.ho  =f[cvlo + (1 +f)hg~.                                  (6.2)
       Subtracting Eq. (6.2) from Eq. (6.1) yields

            ha2  - ha0 +f[cVl~ = (1 +f)(hg3   - hg~) + S(h,, - kh).         (6.3)
       If  the compressor entry temperature TI is the same as the ambient temperature To then
       Eq. (6.3) may be rewritten as
            (h,2  - hall +f[CVI”  =(I  +f)[(hg3 - hg4) + (hg4 - hgs) + (hgs - hgoll
                                                                           (6.3a)
                                + S[(h,, - h,)  + (44 - 4s) + (h,S  - h\6)1.
         But across the HRSG the heat balance is

            (1 +f)[(hg4  - hgs) + S(h4 - h.1s)l = S(h,, - ~Ud,              (6.4)
       in  which the pumping work for the water is ignored, and the water enters at ambient
       temperature with enthalpy hWo.
         Combining this equation with Eq. (6.3a) yields the final energy equation for the whole
       plant as
           f[cv]o = (WT  - WC) +  1  +f)(hg5   - hg0) + S(h55  - hw0>17     (6.5)
       in  which  the  terms in  brackets correspond to the three terms in  Lloyd’s closed cycle
       analysis, QB, W,  QA,  respectively, and
            QB  = W+ QA.                                                    (6.6)
         The overall efficiency of the plant is

            77 = (WT  - wC)/f[cvlO
              = {  1 +f][hg3  - hg41 +  Ih.1,  - hd - [hd2 - hail )lf[cvlo.   (6.7)

       so that




       by analogy with the form given by Lloyd,

            77 = W/QB = [I + (QA/~)]-’.                                    (6.9)
         Lloyd argues that for a plant with fixed pressure ratio and top temperature, the turbine
       work output (and hence the net work output) is increased linearly with the steam quantity S
       that  is  injected, but  the  QB and  QA terms  increase more  slowly. Thus, the  efficiency
       similarly increases with S, but also more slowly.
         Fig.  6.3,  which  gives  illustrative plots  of  temperature against the  fraction  of  heat
       transferred, shows how the HRSG performs, first at low S (Fig. 6.3a), and then with higher
       (optimum) S (Fig. 6.3b). Lloyd  concludes that  maximum  efficiency is  reached  when
   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119