Page 81 - Advanced Gas Turbine Cycles
P. 81

Chapter 4.  Cycle eficiency with turbine cooling (cooling flow rates specified)   57

       than the efficiency of  the uncooled turbine (q)121 at the same T3  (point B), as given in
                                                                   at
       Eq. (4.24). But it is the same as the efficiency of the uncooled turbine (q)~ point C, at a
       maximum temperature T5 (the rotor inlet temperature of the cooled turbine). Here the
       analysis of Section 4.2.2.1, for a/s cycles with constant specific heats, is developed further,
       to find the slopes of the curves (aq/a/ae), at all the three points A, B and C; the slopes are
       then used to determine the relations between the expressions for (q)~cl and (q)1~.
         An  approximate relation for the cooling fraction  $ obtained by  El-Masri  [lo], and
       derived in Appendix A, is also used,
            $= KIT3  - Tbll/[Tbl - T217                                   (4.25)
       where Tbl is the allowable (constant) blade temperature, T2  is the compressor delivery
       (coolant)  temperature  and  K  is  a  constant  (approximately  0.05).  Differentiation of
       Eq. (4.24) at constant x (and T2), and using Eq. (4.25), yields

                                                 Xi)~{ - [(p - XYV~IM~ - x12,
            ra(~)lcl/ae]x = EW(X  - w(p - X?  + E  ~  -   1
                                                                          (4.26)
       where T = (0, - &),  with   = Tbl/TI assumed constant. The first term on the right hand
       side gives the rate of increase of thermal efficiency in the absence of cooling, [a(q),,/a  01,.
       After some algebra [5], it follows that
                                                                          (4.27)
             [a(7))ICl/a  e], )A  = (  - K, { [a(q)lU/a  e],  B *
       So in Fig. 4.6a, the slope of the   curve at A is (1  - K) times the slope of the (q)rU
       curve at B. (q)Icl thus increases with T3 at a smaller rate than (7)~. (4.27) may then be
                                                             Eq.
       integrated to (non-dimensional) temperature 6, from @.,I  where   = 0, and the uncooled
       and cooled efficiencies are the same, [(q)IU]bl = [(q)I(-llbl  = (&I.
         Thus
           (q)ICl  - (q)b1 = (1  - K)[(r))lU  - (q)bll,                   (4.28)
       or

           (q)ICI  = (1 - K)(q)lU + K(?l)hl-                              (4.29)
       as illustrated in Fig. 4.6b. Hence
                                                                          (4.30)
               = (v)lU  - (rl)ICl  = K[(q)lU  - (q)bl]*
       An  alternative  approach is  shown  in  Fig.  4.612.  The  cooled efficiency  (q)lcl may  be
       presented as a  unique function of  the  rotor inlet temperature (T5), for  a given x  and
       component efficiencies. But from the El-Masri expression, Q. (4.25), it can be deduced
       that the cooling air quantity $is a function of the combustion temperature T3, for a given x
       (and T2) and a selected blade temperature Tbl, so that from the steady flow energy equation
       for the mixing process, there is a value of T3 corresponding to the rotor inlet temperature
       Ts. Analytically, we may therefore state that ( q)IcI = f(Ts) and ( ~ 7 ) ~ ~f(T3), but taking
                                                                =
       note that Ts =f(T3). Thus, uncooled and cooled efficiencies may be plotted against two
       horizontal scales, T3 and Ts, as indicated in Fig. 4.6c, which results in a single line. This
       point is further discussed in Section 4.4.
   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86