Page 82 - Advanced Gas Turbine Cycles
P. 82

58                         Advanced gas turbine cycles

          4.2.2.3.  Cycle with two step cooling [CHTIIC~
             For two step cooling, now with irreversible compression and expansion, Fig. 4.7 shows
          that the turbine entry temperature is reduced from T3 to T5 by mixing with the cooling air
          &+ taken from the compressor exit, at state 2, pressurep2, temperature T2 (Fig. 4.7a). After
          expansion to temperature T9, the turbine gas flow (1 + &+) is mixed with compressor air at
          state 7 (mass flow JIL) abstracted at the same pressure p7 with temperature T7, to give a
          cooled  gas  flow  (1 + I+!+, + JIL)  at  temperature  Ts. This  gas  is  then  expanded  to
          temperature Tl0.
             It may be shown [5] that
                          -
               7hc2 = (h~ - 1) + (CILEL(XL  - I)I/(P - x),                    (4.31)
                            [&I&
          where sL = [l - (m~/&~) - r)~ + (m/xL)]. It has been assumed here that x >> xH,  so
          that the efficiencies qc and   are the same over the isentropic temperature ratios x and xL.
             For the a/s example quoted earlier, with this form of two stage cooling (with x  = 2.79,
          xH = 1.22,  &+ = 0.1,  JIL = 0.05),  the  thermal  efficiency  is  reduced  from  0.4442
          (uncooled) to 0.4257, i.e. by 0.0185, still not a significant reduction. If the second step
          of cooling uses compressor delivery air rather than air taken at the appropriate pressure
          along the compressor, then the analysis proceeds as before, except that the expansion work
          for the processes 7, 11 in Fig. 4.7a is replaced by that corresponding to 7',  11' in Fig. 4.7b.
          It may be shown [5] that the efficiency may then be written as

               ?hC2  = (7)lU  - { @(x  - 1) - &(E  - EL)  - mtk(xH - I)}/(@ - x).   (4.32)
          The second term in the curly brackets is very small indeed and may be ignored; the last
          term in these brackets effectively represents the throttling loss in this irreversible cycle.
             For the numerical example the cooled efficiency becomes 0.4205, a reduction of 0.0237
          from  (T/)~" = 0.4442.  The extra loss  in  efficiency for  throttling the  cooling air from
          compressor discharge to the appropriate pressure at the LP turbine entry is thus 0.0052 for
          the numerical example, which is again quite small.

              T                      3          T                      3
                                           TB















                                         S                                S
                              a                                 b
          Fig. 4.7. Temperam-entropy  diagram  for  two  step cooling-irreversible  cycle.  (a) Cooling  air  taken  at
                   appropriate pressures. (b) Cooling air throttled from compressor exit (after Ref. [5]).
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87