Page 101 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 101

80                the analysis, the conclusion reached is that delocalization (hyperconjugation) is the
                       principal factor favoring the staggered conformation. 107
     CHAPTER 1             When methyl groups are added, as in butane, two additional conformations are
     Chemical Bonding  possible. There are two staggered conformations, called anti and gauche, and two
     and Molecular Structure
                       eclipsed conformations, one with methyl-methyl eclipsing and the other with two
                       hydrogen-methyl alignments. In the methyl-methyl eclipsed conformation, van der
                       Waals repulsions come into play. The barrier for this conformation increases to about
                       6 kcal/mol, as shown in Figure 1.35. We pursue the conformation of hydrocarbons
                       further in Section 2.2.1.
                           Changing the atom bound to a methyl group from carbon to nitrogen to oxygen, as in
                       goingfromethanetomethylaminetomethanol,whichresultsinshorterbonds,producesa
                       regular decrease in the rotational barrier from 2.9 to 2.0 to 1.1 kcal/mol, respectively. The
                       NPA analysis was applied to a dissection of these barriers. 108  The contributions to differ-
                       ences in energy between the eclipsed and staggered conformations were calculated for
                       four factors. These are effects on the localized bonds  E Lewis  , hyperconjugation  E deloc  ,
                       van der Waals repulsions  E steric  , and exchange  E 2×2  . The dominant stabilizing terms
                       are the 
E deloc  and 
E 2×2 , representing hyperconjugation and exchange, respectively, but










































                              Fig. 1.35. Potential energy diagram for rotation about the C(2)−C(3) bond in butane.

                       107
                          V. Pophristic and L. Goodman, Nature, 411, 565 (2001); F. Weinhold, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.,
                          42, 4188 (2003).
                       108   J. K. Badenhoop and F. Weinhold, Int. J. Quantum Chem., 72, 269 (1999).
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106