Page 102 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 102

this analysis indicates that the overall barrier results from compensating trends in the four  81
          components. These results pertain to a fixed geometry and do not take into account bond
          angle and bond length adjustments in response to rotation.                        TOPIC 1.2
                                                                                           Heteroatom
                                                                                        Hyperconjugation
                                                                                      (Anomeric Effect) in
                                                                CH 3 OH                Acyclic Molecules
                                   CH 3 CH 3     CH 3 NH 2
                                   −1 423        −0 766         −0 440
                     
E Lewis
                                   +4 953        +2 920         +1 467
                     
E deloc
                                   −0 827        −0 488         −1 287
                     
E steric
                                   +2 009        +1 483         +0 475
                     
E 2×2
                                   +4 712        +3 149         +0 215
                     
E total
              The methanol rotational barrier was further explored, using the approach described
          above for ethane. 109  The effect of changes in molecular structure that accompany
          rotation were included. The approach taken was to systematically compare the effect on
          the rotational barrier of each specific interaction, e.g., hyperconjugation and exchange
          repulsion, and to determine the effect on molecular geometry, i.e., bond lengths and
          angles. The analysis of electrostatic forces (nuclear-nuclear, electron-electron, and
          nuclear-electron) showed that it was the nuclear-electron forces that are most important
          in favoring the staggered conformation, whereas the other two actually favor the
          eclipsed conformation. The structural response to the eclipsed conformation is to
          lengthen the C−O bond, destabilizing the molecule. The more favorable nuclear-
          electron interaction in the staggered conformation is primarily a manifestation of
          hyperconjugation. In comparison with ethane, a major difference is the number of
          hyperconjugative interactions. The oxygen atom does not have any antibonding orbitals
          associated with its unshared electron pairs and these orbitals cannot act as acceptors.
          The oxygen unshared electrons function only as donors to the adjacent anti C–H bonds
          The total number of hyperconjugative interactions is reduced from six in ethane to two
          in methanol.


                                     H              H
                                  H      H
                                                    O
                                   H     H        H     H
                                     H              H
                                  six anti H-H  two anti H-H
                                 combinations   combinations




          Topic 1.2. Heteroatom Hyperconjugation (Anomeric Effect) in Acyclic
                     Molecules


              It is expected that hyperconjugation would be enhanced in certain systems
          containing heteroatoms. If one atom with an unshared electron pair is a particularly
          good electron donor and another a good   acceptor, the n →   contribution should
                                                               ∗
                                             ∗
          be enhanced. This is represented by a charged, “no-bond” resonance structure.
          109
             V. Pophristic and L. Goodman, J. Phys. Chem. A, 106, 1642 (2002).
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107