Page 432 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 432

Table 4.5. Solvent Nucleophilicity and Ionization Parameters a           413
                                        t-Butyl chloride  2-Adamantyl tosylate            SECTION 4.2
                                                                                    Structural and Solvation
                          Solvent        N       Y       N Tos  Y Tos
                                                                                      Effects on Reactivity
                   Ethanol             +0 09   −2 03     0.00  −1 75
                   Methanol            +0 01   −1 09   −0 04   −0 92
                   50% Aqueousethanol  −0 20     1.66  −0 09     1.29
                   Water               −0 26     3.49
                   Acetic acid         −2 05   −1 64   −2 35   −0 61
                   Formic acid         −2 05     2.05  −2 35     3.04
                   Trifluoroethanol    −2 78     1.05  −3 0      1.80
                   97%  CF 3   2 CHOH-H 2 O  −3 93  2.46  −4 27  3.61
                   Trifluoroacetic acid  −4 74   1.84  −5 56     4.57
                   a. From F. L. Schadt, T. W. Bentley, and P. v. R. Schleyer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 98, 7667
                     (1976).
          the Y terms, which have to do with ionizing power and results from the more polar
          character of formic acid. The nucleophilicity parameters of formic acid and acetic acid
          are the same, as might be expected, because the nucleophilicity is associated with the
          carboxy group.

          4.2.3. Leaving-Group Effects

              The nature of the leaving group influences the rate of nucleophilic substitution
          proceeding by either the direct displacement or ionization mechanism. Since the leaving
          group departs with the pair of electrons from the covalent bond to the reacting carbon
          atom, a correlation with both bond strength and anion stability is expected. Provided
          the reaction series consists of structurally similar leaving groups, such relationships
          are observed. For example, a linear free-energy relationship (Hammett equation) has
          been demonstrated for the rate of reaction of ethyl arenesulfonates with ethoxide
          ion in ethanol. 33  A qualitative trend of increasing reactivity with the acidity of the
          conjugate acid of the leaving group also holds for less similar systems, although no
          generally applicable quantitative system for specifying leaving-group ability has been
          established.
              Table 4.6 lists estimated relative rates of solvolysis of 1-phenylethyl esters and
          halides in 80% aqueous ethanol at 75 C. 34  The reactivity of the leaving groups

          generally parallels their electron-accepting capacity. Trifluoroacetate, for example, is
                  6
          about 10 time as reactive as acetate and p-nitrobenzenesulfonate is about 10 times
          more reactive than p-toluenesulfonate. The order of the halide leaving groups is I >
                                                                             −
                  −
          Br > Cl   F . This order is opposite to that of electronegativity and is dominated
                       −
             −
          by the strength of the bond to carbon, which increases from ∼ 55kcal for the C−I
          bond to ∼ 110kcal for the C−F bond (see Table 3.2).
              Sulfonate esters are especially useful reactants in nucleophilic substitution
          reactions in synthesis. They have a high level of reactivity and can be prepared from
          alcohols by reactions that do not directly involve the carbon atom at which substi-
          tution is to be effected. The latter feature is particularly important in cases where the
          stereochemical and structural integrity of the reactant must be maintained. Trifluo-
          romethanesulfonate (triflate) ion is an exceptionally reactive leaving group and can

           33   M. S. Morgan and L. H. Cretcher, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 70, 375 (1948).
           34
             D. S. Noyce and J. A. Virgilio J. Org. Chem., 37, 2643 (1972).
   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437