Page 437 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 437

418                            Table 4.10. Substituent Effects of 
-EWG Substituents a

     CHAPTER 4                             ZCH  2  Cl  +  I –    ZCH  2  I
     Nucleophilic Substitution
                                  Z           Relative rate       Z         Relative rate

                              CH CH CH 2       1              PhC O           3.2 × 10 4
                                3
                                   2
                              PhSO 2           0.25           N  C            3 × 10 3
                                                                H OC
                              CH C  O          3.5 × 10 4     C 2 5   O       1.7 × 10 3
                                3
                              a. F. G. Bordwell and W. T. Branner, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 86, 4645 (1964).

                           Adjacent carbonyl groups also affect reactivity. Substitution by the ionization
                       mechanism proceeds slowly on 
-halo derivatives of ketones, aldehydes, acids, esters,
                       nitriles, and related compounds. As discussed on p. 304, such substituents destabilize
                       a carbocation intermediate, but substitution by the direct displacement mechanism
                       proceeds especially readily in these systems. Table 4.10 indicates some representative
                       relative rate accelerations.
                           Steric effects may be responsible for part of the observed acceleration, since an
                         2
                       sp carbon, such as in a carbonyl group, offers less steric resistance to the incoming
                       nucleophile than an alkyl group. The major effect is believed to be electronic. The
                       adjacent   LUMO of the carbonyl group can interact with the electron density that
                       builds up at the pentacoordinate carbon in the TS. This can be described in resonance
                       terminology as a contribution from an enolate-like structure to the TS. In MO termi-
                       nology, the low-lying LUMO has a stabilizing interaction with the developing p orbital
                       of the TS (see p. 394 for MO representations of the S 2 transition state). 49
                                                                   N

                                 Nu                Nu                              LUMO
                            – O               – O
                                                           HOMO

                                 X                 X
                             resonance representation of    MO representation of stabilization
                             electronic interaction with carbonyl  of substitution transition state through
                             group and substitution center  interaction with C    O π* orbital
                             to delocalize negative charge

                       It should be noted that not all electron-attracting groups enhance reactivity. The
                       sulfonyl and trifluoro groups, which cannot participate in this type of   conjugation,
                       retard the rate of S 2 substitution at an adjacent carbon. 50
                                      N
                           The extent of the rate enhancement of adjacent substituents is dependent on the
                       nature of the TS. The most important factor is the nature of the  -type orbital that
                       develops at the trigonal bipyramidal carbon in the TS. If the carbon is cationic in
                       character, electron donation from adjacent substituents becomes stabilizing. If bond
                       formation at the TS is advanced, resulting in charge buildup at carbon, electron

                        49   R. D. Bach, B. A. Coddens, and G. J. Wolber, J. Org. Chem., 51, 1030 (1986); F. Carrion and
                          M. J. S. Dewar, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 106, 3531 (1984); S. S. Shaik, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 105, 4359 (1983);
                          D. McLennon and A. Pross, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans., 2, 981 (1984); T. I. Yousaf and E. S. Lewis,
                          J. Am. Chem. Soc., 109, 6137 (1987).
                        50
                          F. G. Bordwell and W. T. Brannen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 86, 4645 (1964).
   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442