Page 502 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part B - Reactions & Synthesis
P. 502

476              for the “ortho” product when the diene has a donor (ERG) substituent at C(1) and for
                       “para” product when the diene has an ERG at C(2), as in the examples shown. 5
      CHAPTER 6
      Concerted                                                   N(CH 2 CH 3 ) 2
                                       2
                                          3 2
      Cycloadditions,              N(CH CH )                           CO CH CH
      Unimolecular                              CO CH CH 3 20°C          2  2  3
                                                  2
                                                     2
      Rearrangements, and                  +
      Thermal Eliminations
                                                                  “ortho”-like
                                                               only product (94%)
                                                                 CH 3 CH 2 O
                              CH CH O                     160°C
                                    2
                                 3
                                            +
                                                   CO CH 3                     CO 2 CH 3
                                                      2
                                                                      “para”-like
                                                                   only product (50%)
                       When the dienophile bears an EWG substituent and the diene an ERG, the strongest
                       interaction is between the HOMO of the diene and the LUMO of the dienophile.
                       The reactants are oriented so that the carbons having the highest coefficients of these
                       two frontier orbitals can begin the bonding process, and this leads to the observed
                       regiochemical preference as summarized in Figure 6.2.
                           Diels-Alder reactions are stereospecific with respect to the E- and Z-relationships
                       in both the dienophile and the diene. For example, addition of dimethyl fumarate and
                       dimethyl maleate with cyclopentadiene is completely stereospecific with respect to the
                       cis or trans orientation of the ester substituents.
                                                                                  CO CH
                                         CO 2 CH 3                                   2  3
                                   +              25°C                 +          CO CH 3
                                                                                     2
                                                               CO CH
                                          CO CH 3                 2  3
                                            2
                                                              CO CH 3
                                                                2
                                                                        90% yield 74:26 mixture
                                                                                        Ref. 6
                                               CO CH 3               CO CH 3
                                                                       2
                                                 2
                                       +
                                      CH O C                      CO CH 3  only product
                                          2
                                         3
                                                                    2
                                                                                        Ref. 7
                       Similarly, E,E-2,4-hexadiene gives a product that is stereospecific with respect to the
                       diene methyl groups.
                                                                   CH 3
                                           CH 3       O              H  O
                                                +     O                  O
                                                      O              H  O
                                           CH 3                    CH 3
                                                                                        Ref. 8

                        5
                          J. Sauer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 6, 16 (1967).
                        6
                          W. Kirmse, U. Mrotzeck, and R. Siegfried, Chem. Ber., 124, 238 (1991).
                        7   C. Girard and R. Bloch, Tetrahedron Lett., 23, 3683 (1982).
                        8
                          G. Berube and P. Deslongchamps, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr., 103 (1987).
   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507