Page 150 - Advanced thermodynamics for engineers
P. 150

136    CHAPTER 6 FINITE TIME (OR ENDOREVERSIBLE) THERMODYNAMICS




                The analytical formulae for the nondimensional power output and efficiency, as functions of the
             total pressure ratio, component effectiveness for the heat exchangers (HTHE {ε HE }, hot- {ε H } and
             cold-side {ε L } heat exchangers), compressor and turbine efficiencies and the thermal capacity rates of
             the working fluid and the heat reservoirs, the pressure recovery coefficient, the heat reservoir inlet
             temperature ratio, are derived and analysed in Ma and Turan (2009). IFGT cycles are most efficient
             under low compression ratio ranges (2.0–5.0) and are ideal for micro gas turbine technology with their
             low power output. The optimal total pressure ratio, p C , under maximum power output is always higher
             than that under maximum cycle thermal efficiency. When either of the heat transfer effectiveness of the
             hot or the cold-side heat exchanger, the pressure recovery coefficient, isentropic efficiencies of the gas
             turbine and the compressor and the heat reservoir inlet temperature ratio increases, the dimensionless
             power output, cycle efficiency and their corresponding optimal total pressure ratios increase. It must be
             noted that the optimal total pressure ratio, p C , under the maximum cycle thermal efficiency decreases
             with the increase of heat transfer effectiveness of the HTHE. The model derived can be further used to
             optimise the operational parameters and forecast performance of practical IFGT configurations and
             choices.
                Figure 6.12 gives the particular relationship between h IFGT and P IFGT with h C ¼ 0.85, h T ¼ 0.85,
             D ¼ 0.93, T Hin /T Lin ¼ 4.0 and ε H ¼ ε L ¼ 0.90, under several specific values of ε HE with a varying total
             compression ratio of the compressor, p C . Figure 6.12, which shows the variation of P IFGT with h IFGT ,
             indicates that the relationship is a completely closed curve; this is much different from the parabolic
             curves of the Carnot cycle and the regenerated endoreversible closed Brayton cycle. It is apparent that
             the operating conditions for maximum power are not the same as those for maximum efficiency. Also
             Fig. 6.12 shows how important a high value of heat exchanger effectiveness, ε HE , is if a high value of
             overall thermal efficiency or high power output are to be obtained.


                                 0.6


                                  0.5

                                 0.4


                                P IFGT  0.3                     = 1.0. 0.9, 0.8, 0.7
                                                            ε   ΗΕ
                                  0.2

                                  0.1


                                   00
                                    0     0.1    0.2    0.3   0.4    0.5    0.6
                                                       η
                                                        IFGT
             FIGURE 6.12
             Variation of nondimensional power with thermal efficiency.
   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155