Page 220 - Advances in bioenergy (2016)
P. 220

REFORMATION OF BIOETHANOL


        The use of bioethanol as renewable hydrogen carrier is attractive because of its wide
        availability, storage, and handling safety, and because it can be produced from several biomass
        sources. Reformation of ethanol by steam [Eq. (1), Table 9.1] offers significant advantages
        over competing processes. Steam reforming (SR) of ethanol produces high yields of hydrogen
        at elevated temperatures. Recently, alternative processes operating at lower temperatures are
        being investigated.


        High Temperature Ethanol SR


        SR of ethanol is a strongly endothermic reaction and, thus, it exhibits maximum performance
        with respect to hydrogen yield at high temperatures, typically >700°C. Depending on the
        catalyst used and operating conditions, several reactions may run in series and in parallel,
        producing acetaldehyde, hydrogen, methane, carbon oxides, and ethylene, as per Eqs (2)–(8) in
        Table 9.1. Equation (2) can occur either directly, or via intermediate formation of acetaldehyde
        as the sum of Eqs (3) and (9).

        The production of hydrogen via SR of ethanol at high temperatures has been studied over a
                                                     16
                                                                                  18
        variety of metal catalysts, including Co,  Rh,      16,17  Pd, 16,17  and Ni.  Catalytic performance tests
        obtained over Pd, Rh, Ni, and Co supported on MgO showed that Rh exhibits the best
        performance in terms of ethanol conversion and stability, whereas Ni exhibits the highest
                                         16
        hydrogen selectivity (>95%).  For low-loaded Al O  supported catalysts, Rh is significantly
                                                                  2 3
        more active and selective toward hydrogen formation compared to Ru, Pt, and Pd, which show
                              17
        a similar behavior.  Catalytic activity and selectivity is strongly affected by the nature of the
        support. For 10 wt% Ni-based catalysts ethanol conversion reaches almost 100% at 650°C for
                                     19
        all catalysts investigated.  However, selectivity toward H  follows the order:
                                                                           2
        Ni/ZnO ≈ Ni/La O  > Ni/MgO > Ni/γ-Al O . Similarly, it has been found that Ni catalyst
                          2 3
                                                       2 3
        exhibits higher activity and selectivity toward hydrogen production and, most important, long
        term stability when supported on La O  compared with Al O , YSZ, and MgO.                 18
                                                                          2 3
                                                 2 3
        Typical results obtained over several catalytic materials are presented in Figure 9.1, in which
        conversion of ethanol and selectivity toward hydrogen are plotted as functions of reaction
        temperature. It is observed that the homogeneous conversion of ethanol becomes significant at
        temperatures above 750°C and reaches 80% at 850°C (Figure 9.1a). However, selectivity
        toward hydrogen is very low under these conditions and increases from ca. 35 to 55% upon
        increasing reaction temperature from 650 to 850°C (Figure 9.1b). The Ni/(La O /Al O )
                                                                                                2 3     2 3
        catalyst exhibits superior catalytic performance with X       EtOH  reaching 100% at temperatures
        higher than 800°C and selectivity toward H  exceeding 95% at 840°C. The activity of 0.5%
                                                         2
        Rh/Al O  catalyst is comparable with that of Ni/(La O /Al O ). However, selectivity toward
                                                                           2 3
               2 3
                                                                   2 3
        hydrogen is poor over the rhodium catalyst, especially at temperatures below 750°C. The 20%
        Co/Al O  catalyst is almost inactive under the experimental conditions employed. The
               2 3
   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225