Page 29 - Advances in bioenergy (2016)
P. 29

Figure 20.7 Stacking of a Eucalyptus nitens stems in a SMZ in northern Tasmania,
                 Australia, by a Tigercat tracked harvester (photo by Daniel G. Neary).

             Chapter 21

                 Figure 21.1 A Streamside Management Zone along the Black River, Arizona, USA.
                 Reproduced with permission of the USDA Forest Service and Daniel G. Neary.

                 Figure 21.2 Schematic of a lifecycle for forest bioenergy. Reproduced with permission
                 of Daniel G. Neary.

                 Figure 21.3 Life cycle assessment phases according to ISO 14040 (1997). Reproduced
                 from Ref 41. Copyright 2004, Elsevier.

                 Figure 21.4 USDA Forest Service nonpoint source strategy. Reproduced from Ref 9.
                 Copyright 2012, United States Department of Agriculture.

                 Figure 21.5 Stream protection BMP system for Queensland, Australia, based on
                 distances from waterways and harvesting operations guidelines. Reproduced from Ref
                 66 with permission from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Queensland,
                 Australia, 2013.

                 Figure 21.6 Hypothertical SMZ design typical of the flexible boundary RMZ forest
                 harvesting designs used by the Minnesota Forest Resources Council to protect water
                 quality. Reproduced with permission from Ref 33. Copyright 2010, ECOMED.

             Chapter 22

                 Figure 22.1 Relationship of management objectives to removal of nutrient-rich plant
                 material and associated nutrient stress.

                 Figure 22.2 Overview of site assessment, level of monitoring, and need for nutrient
                 amendments in relation to nutrient stresses imposed by bioenergy production (see text

                 for details).
             Chapter 23

                 Figure 23.1 Layout of neutron probe access tubes for soil moisture measurement in

                 Jatropha and Pongamia field at ICRISAT, Patancheru.
                 Figure 23.2 (a) Depth wise soil moisture content during 12 months in Jatropha
                 experimental field; (b) depth wise soil moisture content during 12 months in Pongamia

                 experimental field.

                 Figure 23.3 Monthly simulated water balance of Jatropha and Pongamia fields at
                 ICRISAT for a selected normal year (2003–2004); the upper part of the graphs show
                 the source of the water (rainfall and change in soil moisture content), and the lower
                 part presents various sink components: ET, surface runoff, deep percolation, change in
                 soil moisture content.

             Chapter 24
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34