Page 35 - Advances in Biomechanics and Tissue Regeneration
P. 35

2.4 BIOMECHANICAL MODEL OF THE SEMICIRCULAR DUCTS                     29

                          1        2       3       4        5       6        7       8       9       10


                    FEM





                    RPIM




                    NNRPIM





           FIG. 2.6  Ten first modes of vibration of the two-dimensional cupula with FEM, RPIM, and NNRPIM.



           TABLE 2.1 The 10 First Vibration Frequencies of the Two-Dimensional Cupula with FEM, RPIM, and NNRPIM
                                                            Natural frequency (Hz)
                       1        2         3        4         5        6         7        8         9         10
           FEM         54.70    121.32    131.62   226.17    259.80   265.13    345.26   350.33    362.51    386.60
           RPIM        51.78    117.27    126.98   216.15    249.26   251.89    324.66   329.32    340.28    359.79
           NNRPIM      51.48    117.36    126.35   213.64    249.12   251.08    321.02   330.41    338.08    361.29




              Thus, to observe the effect of the endolymph around the cupula, the first five vibration modes of the cupula are
           presented in Fig. 2.7, for the FEM and both meshless methods. Note that the first two vibration modes obtained with
           the FEM resemble the first vibration mode obtained in Fig. 2.6. Furthermore, the third, fourth, and fifth vibration
           modes obtained now are very similar to the second vibration mode obtained in the analysis of the cupula without
           surrounding fluid.
              The same effect is verified for the RPIM and NNPRIM approaches, the first vibration mode of the present RPIM
           analysis resembles the first vibration mode obtained in the cupula without fluid, and the second and third vibration
           modes of the present analysis are very similar to the second vibration mode obtained in Fig. 2.6.
              Regarding the natural frequencies of the cupula surrounded by endolymph, in this study, the results obtained were
           59 and 75Hz in FEM, 61Hz in the RPIM analysis, and 60 and 63Hz in NNRPIM analysis, for the first resembling mode.
           Note that these values are closed to the ones observed in Table 2.1, indicating that the fluid has a reduced influence on
           the magnitude of the cupula’s natural frequency.
              In the next step of the present study, another possible cause of vertigo was simulated, the cupulolithiasis, which
           happens when the otoconia get attached to the cupula. Then, two different situations were simulated, one with
           one otoconium and another with three otoconia, as could be observed in the first line of Fig. 2.8.
              The goal is to understand if the inclusion of the otoconia changes significantly the natural frequency of the cupula.
           Since the results obtained in the previous analyses with the three formulations were very similar, in Fig. 2.8, only the
           results regarding the NNRPIM formulation are presented.
              When one otoconium (or one otoconium group) is considered, the frequencies of the cupula resembling its natural
           frequency (observed in Fig. 2.8) using the NNPRIM formulation are 61.42Hz, which is also a very close result with the
           three-otoconium situation, which obtained 61.80Hz for the same conditions. This may indicate that the size of the oto-
           conium particles is not enough to change significantly the vibration frequency of the cupula [40].
              The global results showed that the three different methodologies applied are capable to achieve similar results.
           However, most importantly, this work opens a new research branch in the computational analysis of the vestibular
           system.



                                                       I. BIOMECHANICS
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40