Page 437 - Advances in Eco-Fuels for a Sustainable Environment
P. 437

390                              Advances in Eco-Fuels for a Sustainable Environment

         [35] Jindal S, Nandwana BP, Rathore NS, Vashistha V. Experimental investigation of the effect
             of compression ratio and injection pressure in a direct injection diesel engine running on
             Jatropha methyl ester. Appl Therm Eng 2010;30:442–8.
         [36] Anand R. Simultaneous control of oxides of nitrogen and soot in CRDI diesel engine using
             split injection and Cool EGR fuelled with waste frying oil biodiesel and its blends. In: Air
             pollution and control. Springer; 2017. p. 11–44.
         [37] Gnanasekaran S, Ilangkumaran M. Influence of injection timing on performance, emission
             and combustion characteristics of a DI diesel engine running on fish oil biodiesel. Energy
             2016;116:1218–29.
         [38] Ezekannagha CB, Ude CN, Onukwuli OD. Optimization of the methanolysis of lard oil in
             the production of biodiesel with response surface methodology. Egypt J Pet
             2017;26:103–10.
         [39] Muthukumaran C, Praniesh R, Navamani P, Swathi R, Sharmila G, Manoj Kumar N. Pro-
             cess optimization and kinetic modelling of biodiesel production using non-edible
             Madhuca indica oil. Fuel 2017;195:217–25.
         [40] Birla A, Singh B, Upadhyay SN, Sharma YC. Kinetics studies of synthesis of biodiesel
             from waste frying oil using heterogeneous catalyst derived from snail shell. Bioresour
             Technol 2012;106:95–106.
         [41] Anwar M, Rasul MG, Ashwath N. Production optimization and quality assessment of
             papaya (Carica papaya) biodiesel with response surface methodology. Energy Convers
             Manag 2018;156:103–12.
         [42] Sneha E, Anand R, Meera S, Begam KM, Anantharaman N. Biodiesel production from
             waste cooking oil using KBr impregnated CaO as catalyst. Energy Convers Manag
             2015;91:442–50.
         [43] Roy PK, Datta S, Nandi S, Al Basir F. Effect of mass transfer kinetics for maximum pro-
             duction of biodiesel from jatropha curcas oil: a mathematical approach. Fuel
             2014;134:39–44.
         [44] Zhang ZH, Balasubramanian R. Investigation of particulate emission characteristics of a
             diesel engine fuelled with higher alcohols/biodiesel blends. Appl Energy 2016;163:71–80.
         [45] Zaharina MSM, Abdullaha NR, Najafi G, Sharudina H, Yusaf T. Effects of physicochem-
             ical properties of biodiesel fuel blends with alcohol on diesel engine performance and
             exhaust emissions: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2017;79:475–93.
         [46] Geng P, Cao E, Tan Q, Wei L. Effects of alternative fuels on the combustion character-
             istics and emission products from diesel engines: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev
             2017;71:523–34.
         [47] Azad AK, Rasul MG, Khan MMK, Sharma SC, Bhuiya MMK. Recent development of
             biodiesel combustion strategies and modelling for compression ignition engines. Renew
             Sust Energ Rev 2016;56:1068–86.
         [48] Sukjit E, Herreros JM, Piaszyk J, Dearn KD, Tsolakis A. Finding synergies in fuels prop-
             erties for the design of renewable fuels—hydroxylated biodiesel effects on butanol-diesel
             blends. Environ Sci Technol 2013;47:3535–42.
         [49] Azad AK, Rasul MG, Khan MMK, Sharma SC. Macadamia biodiesel as a sustainable and
             alternative transport fuel in Australia. Energy Procedia 2017;110:543–8.
         [50] Atadashi I, Aroua MK, Abdul Aziz A. High quality biodiesel and its diesel engine appli-
             cation: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2010;14:1999–2008.
         [51] Mofijur M, Rasul MG, Hyde J, Azad AK, Mamat M, Bhuiya MMK. Role of biofuel and
             their binary (diesel–biodiesel) and ternary (ethanol–biodiesel–diesel) blends on internal
             combustion engines emission reduction. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2016;53:265–78.
   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442