Page 92 - Advances in Renewable Energies and Power Technologies
P. 92

2. Criteria for Site Selection  65




                  1.3 DEALING WITH UNCERTAINTIES IN PHOTOVOLTAIC
                      SITE SELECTION

                  In many of real-life situations, there is ambiguous and incomplete information due to
                  measurements errors and conceptual inaccuracy; these limitations must be taken into
                  account particularly in the GIS-MCDM analysis. The huge study area along with a
                  large number of alternative sites might have noteworthy uncertainties that had better
                  be considered. Validating the data with ground monitoring devices could reduce the
                  uncertainty. There are several aspects of uncertainty during a solar PV site selection
                  process, uncertainty in the solar irradiation estimation is one of the significant sour-
                  ces of the general energy production uncertainty. Making the composition of accu-
                  rate data is critical for reducing uncertainty in the solar resource estimate; therefore,
                  it increases the assurance in the project’s power estimate [79]. On the other side, two
                  types of uncertainty could be combined with the decision-making process: (1) uncer-
                  tainty associated with the ambiguous concerning the description of the semantic
                  meaning of the statements and events, and (2) uncertainty related to the limited
                  data about the decision situation and errors within. However, the main source of un-
                  certainty in MCDM tools is related to the criteria weights (DM preferences) and
                  criteria values (criteria maps) [61]. For instance, to deal with uncertainty in the
                  DM evaluation in classic AHP, fuzzy AHP selected to elicit the decision criteria
                  weights in this integration of GIS with AHP for the site selection as shown in
                  Table 2.1.
                     Comparisons between different methodologies under the same environment
                  could bring insightfulness to the criteria influences and the outcomes. Further-
                  more, wherever the uncertainty in results designated as a function of the uncer-
                  tainty of the input, one can develop a framework for MCDA using a simulation
                  method, such as Monte Carlo for generating probability distributions of the in-
                  puts [80].
                     Sensitivity analysis focuses on how uncertainty in the output is affected by the
                  uncertainty in the model input factors. Hence, the influence of varying criterion
                  weights on the MCDA model output is, without a doubt, the most frequently applied
                  form of sensitivity analysis in GIS-based multicriteria modeling [81].




                  2. CRITERIA FOR SITE SELECTION
                  To deploy a solar project on a utility-scale, several criteria and factors should be
                  considered with the aim of optimizing the location which will result in more efficient
                  system, more economic to supply the needed customers and less impact on the envi-
                  ronment. Typically, the decision criteria are derived based on the study aim, acces-
                  sibility to the geo-referenced database and the existing literature. The review results
                  in 39 subcriteria assessed mostly under location and climate criteria. Most solar site
                  suitability studies deliberate solar irradiation as the most important decision criteria,
                  as shown in Table 2.2.
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97