Page 116 - Aerodynamics for Engineering Students
P. 116

Governing equations of  fluid mechanics  99

              Simplifying these two equations gives

                                                                                (2.118)
                                               1
                                         f f‘ = -a2F’ - vf”                     (2.119)
                                               2
              where use has been made of the definition of kinematic viscosity (v = p/p). Evidently
              the assumptions made above were acceptable, since we  have succeeded in the aim
              of  reducing the Navier-Stokes  equations to  ordinary  differential equations. Also
              note that the second Eqn  (2.1  19) is only required to determine the pressure field,
              Eqn (2.118) on its own can be solved for f , thus determining the velocity field.
                The boundary conditions at the wall are straightforward, namely
                    u= v=O  at  y=O        implying   f  =f’=O   at  y=O        (2.120)

              As y  -+   m the velocity will tend to its form in the corresponding potential flow. Thus
                      u-ax    as  y-+ co    implying   f’=a  as  y-+ 00         (2.121)
              In its present form Eqn (2.118) contains both  a and v, so that f  depends on these
              parameters as well as being a function of y. It is desirable to derive a universal form
              of  Eqn  (2.118), so that we  only need to solve it once and for all. We  attempt to
              achieve this by scaling the variables  f(y) and y, i.e. by writing
                                        f(Y) = P$(r]),  71 = aY                 (2.122)

              where  a and  ,B  are  constants to  be  determined by  substituting  Eqn  (2.122) into
              Eqn (2.118). Noting that




              Eqn (2.1 18) thereby becomes
                                   QZp2$’2  - &@q5$“   = a2  + ya3pq5“‘         (2.123)
              Thus providing
                     a2p2 = 2 = m3p,     implying    a = m, p =                 (2.124)

              they can be cancelled as common factors and Eqn (2.124) reduces to the universal
              form:

                                        q5’”  + qkj”  - $12  + 1 = 0            (2.125)
              with boundary conditions
                                    $(O)  = q5’(0) = 0,   qqco) = 1
              In fact, 4‘  = u/U, where  U, = ax the velocity in the corresponding potential flow
              found when  r]  -+  cc. It is plotted in Fig.  2.33. We can regard the point  at which
              $’ = 0.99  as marking the edge of  the viscous region. This occurs at r]  E 2.4. This
              viscous region can be regarded as the boundary layer in the vicinity of the stagnation
              point (note, though, no approximation was made to obtain the solution). Its thick-
              ness does not vary with x and is given by
                                            S N 2.4G                            (2.126)
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121