Page 168 - Aerodynamics for Engineering Students
P. 168

Potential flow  151

             The calculation of the influence coefficient is a central and essential part of the panel method,
             and this is the question now addressed. As a first step consider the calculation of the velocity
             induced at a point P by sources of unit strength distributed over a panel centred at point Q.
               In terms of a coordinate system (XQ, YQ) measured relative to the panel (Fig. 3.38), the
             disturbance potential is given by integrating Eqn (3.88) over the panel. Mathematically
             this is expressed as follows
                                  QPQ  = /&I2 In &=iiG&<                        (3.96)
                                         -&I2
             The corresponding velocity components at P in  the  XQ  and YQ directions can be
             readily obtained from Eqn (3.96) as






                                                                                (3.97)


                                                      dJ
                                               yQ
                                          (XQ - <)2  + &
                                  = - lm-1 (XO :,”’”> tan-’ ( XQ - yQ  AS/^ )]
                                                        -
                                                                                (3.98)

               Armed with these results for the velocity components induced at point P due to the
             sources on a panel centred at point Q return now to the problem of calculating the
             influence coefficients. Suppose that points P and Q are chosen to be the collocation
             points i and j respectively. Equations (3.97) and (3.98) give the velocity components
             in a coordinate system relative to panel  j, whereas what are required are the velocity
             components perpendicular and tangential to panel i.  In vector form the velocity at
             collocation point i is given by
























              Fig. 3.38
   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173