Page 358 - Air Pollution Control Engineering
P. 358

07_Chap_Wang.qxd  05/05/2004  4:19 pm  Page 335
                    Flare Process                                                             335

                    Table 3
                    Comparison of Calculated Values and Values Supplied by the Permit Application
                    for Flares
                                                                Calculated value
                    System parameters                           (example Case) a    Reported value
                    Appropriate continuous monitoring system       Yes                   —
                    Emission stream heating value, h               180 Btu/scf           —
                                               e
                    Supplementary fuel flow rate, Q               6200 scfm              —
                                              f
                    Flare gas exit velocity, U                      40 ft/s              —
                                        flg
                    Flare gas flow rate, Q                       36200 scfm              —
                                      flg
                    Steam flow rate, Q                            1140 lb/min            —
                                   s
                       a Based on emission stream 3.

                    4. MANAGEMENT
                    4.1. Data Required for Permit Application

                       The data necessary to perform the calculations consist of HAP emission stream
                    characteristics previously compiled on the HAP Emission Stream Data Form (Table
                    1), flare dimensions, and the required HAP control as determined by the applicable
                    regulations.
                       In the case of a permit review, the data outlined below should be supplied by the
                    applicant. The calculations in this section would then be used to check the appli-
                    cant’s values. Flare system variables at standard conditions (77°F, 1 atm) should include
                    the following:
                        Flare tip diameter, D  (in.)
                                         tip
                        Expected emission stream flow rate, Q (scfm)
                                                        e
                        Emission stream heat content, h (Btu/scf)
                                                  e
                        Temperature of emission stream, T (°F)
                                                    e
                        Mean molecular weight of the emission stream, MW (lb/lb-mol)
                                                                   e
                        Steam flow rate, Q (lb/min)
                                        s
                        Flare gas exit velocity, U  (ft/s)
                                             flg
                        Supplementary fuel flow rate, Q (scfm)
                                                  f
                        Supplementary fuel heat content, h (Btu/scf)
                                                     f
                        Temperature of flare gas, T  (ºF)
                                              flg
                        Flare gas flow rate, Q  (scfm)
                                          flg
                        Flare gas heat content, h  (Btu/scf)
                                            flg
                    4.2. Evaluation of Permit Application
                       Compare the results from the calculated and reported values using Table 3. If the cal-
                    culated values of Q , U , Q , and Q are different from the reported values for these
                                     f   flg  flg     s
                    variables, the differences may be the result of assumptions (e.g., steam to flare gas
                    ratios) involved in the calculations. In such a case, the reviewer may wish to discuss the
                    details of the proposed system with the permit applicant.
                       If the calculated values agree with the reported values, then the operation of the pro-
                    posed flare system may be considered appropriate based on the assumptions made in
   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363