Page 123 - Aircraft Stuctures for Engineering Student
P. 123

4.1 1 Temperature effects  107
         since the end A is restrained from rotation. Similarly the rotation at B is given by

                                 MB            MA
                                 -oc+-62+-eB=o
                                 A4      M      M
         Solving Eqs (iv) and (v) for MA gives




           The fact that the arbitrary moment M  does not appear in the expression for the
         restraining  moment  at A  (similarly it  does  not  appear  in  MB), produced  by  the
         load  W, indicates  an  extremely  useful  application  of  the  reciprocal  theorem,
         namely the model  analysis of statically indeterminate  structures.  For example, the
         fixed beam  of  Fig.  4.26(c) could  possibly  be  a  full-scale bridge  girder.  It  is  then
         only necessary to construct a model, say of Perspex, having the same flexural rigidity
         EZ as the full-scale beam and measure rotations and displacements produced by an
         arbitrary moment M  to obtain fixing moments in the full-scale beam supporting a
         full-scale load.


         F

         A uniform temperature applied across a beam section produces an expansion of the
         beam,  as shown in  Fig. 4.27, provided  there  are no constraints.  However,  a linear
         temperature gradient across the beam  section causes the upper fibres of the beam
         to  expand  more  than  the  lower  ones,  producing  a  bending  strain  as  shown  in
         Fig. 4.28 without the associated bending stresses, again provided no constraints are
         present.
           Consider an element of the beam of depth h and length 6z subjected to a linear
         temperature gradient over its depth, as shown in Fig. 4.29(a). The upper  surface of
                                                             P







                                                 Expansion

         Fig. 4.27  Expansion of beam due to uniform temperature.

                                                             I%








         Fig. 4.28  Bending of beam due to linear temperature gradient.
   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128