Page 468 - Aircraft Stuctures for Engineering Student
P. 468

----- -                           11.3 Thin-walled rectangular section beam  449

          .%-^-"
            11.3  Thir ;-walled  rectangular section beam subjected
                  to t  orsion

         In Example 9.7 we determined the warping distribution in a thin-walled rectangular
         section  beam  which  was  not subjected  to structural constraint. This free warping
         distribution  (wo) was found to be linear around a cross-section and uniform along
         the length of the beam having values at the corners of




         The effect of  structural constraint, such as building  one end  of  the beam  in,  is  to
         reduce  this  free warping  to zero  at the  built-in  section  so that  direct  stresses are
         induced which subsequently modify the shear stresses predicted by elementary torsion
         theory. These direct stresses must be self-equilibrating since the applied load is a pure
         torque.
           The analysis of a rectangular section beam built-in at one end and subjected to a
         pure torque at the other is simplified if  the section is idealized into one comprising
         four corner booms which are assumed to carry all the direct stresses together with
         shear-stress-only carrying walls. The assumption on which the idealization  is based
         is that the direct stress distribution  at any cross-section is directly proportional  to
         the  warping  which  has  been  suppressed. Thus,  the  distribution  of  direct  stress  is
         linear around any cross-section and has values equal in magnitude but opposite in
         sign at opposite corners  of  a  wall. This applies at all cross-sections  since the free
         warping will be suppressed to some extent along the complete length of  the beam.
         In  Fig. 1 1.4(b) all  the  booms  will  have  the  same  cross-sectional  area  from  anti-
         symmetry and, from Eq. (9.70) or Eq. (9.71)
                               at,        hth         1
                           B = -(2   - 1) +-(2   - 1) =-(at,  + hth)
                                6          6         6
         To the boom area B will be added existing concentrations of area such as connecting
         angle sections at the corners. The contributions of stringers may be included by allow-
         ing for their direct stress carrying capacity by increasing the actual wall thickness by
         an amount equal to the total stringer area on one wall before idealizing the section.
           We have seen in Section 9.8 that the effect of structural idealization  is to reduce
         the shear flow in the walls of a beam to a constant value between adjacent booms.


                                               R








                                                            a
                       (a)                                  (b)
         Fig. 11.4  Idealization of a rectangular section beam subjected to torsion: (a) actual; (b) idealized.
   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473