Page 619 -
P. 619
GOAL PROGRAMMING: FORMULATION AND GRAPHICAL SOLUTION 599
Figure 14.2 Portfolios that Satisfy the P 1 Goal
H
3000
Number of Shares of Hub Properties 2000 Feasible + – Available Funds: 25U + 50H = 80 000
Priority Level 1 Goal Equation
with d 1 = d 1 = 0; 0.5U + 0.25H = 700
+
d = 0
1
1000
Portfolios
+
That Will
d 1 > 0
Achieve Priority
Level 1 Goal
U
0 1000 2000 3000 4000
Number of Shares of UK Oil
þ
also result in the value of d ¼ 0. Thus, the shaded region contains all the feasible
1
solution points that achieve the priority level 1 goal.
At this point, we have solved the priority level 1 problem. Note that alternative
optimal solutions are possible; in fact, all solution points in the shaded region in
þ
Figure 14.2 maintain a portfolio risk index of 700 or less, and hence d ¼ 0.
1
The priority level 2 goal for the Nicolo Investment problem is to find a portfolio
that will provide an annual return of at least £9000. Is overachieving the target value
of £9000 a concern? Clearly, the answer is no because portfolios with an annual
return of more than £9000 correspond to higher returns. Is underachieving the
target value of £9000 a concern? The answer is yes because portfolios with an annual
return of less than £9000 are not acceptable to the client. Thus, the objective
function corresponding to the priority level 2 linear programme should minimize
the value of d . However, because goal 2 is a secondary goal, the solution to the
2
priority level 2 linear programme must not degrade the optimal solution to the
priority level 1 problem. Thus, the priority level 2 linear programme can now be
stated.
P 2 Problem
Min d
2
s:t:
25U þ 50H 80 000 Funds available
þ
0:50U þ 0:25H d þ d ¼ 700 P 1 goal
1
1
þ
3U þ 5H d þ d ¼ 9 000 P 2 goal
2 2
d þ ¼ 0 Maintain achievement of P 1 goal
1
þ
þ
U; H; d ; d ; d ; d 0
1 1 2 2
Note that the priority level 2 linear programme differs from the priority level 1 linear
programme in two ways. The objective function involves minimizing the amount by
which the portfolio annual return underachieves the level 2 goal, and another
constraint has been added to ensure that no amount of achievement of the priority
level 1 goal is sacrificed.
Copyright 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has
deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

