Page 57 - An Introduction to Political Communication Third Edition
P. 57

POLITICS IN THE AGE OF MEDIATION

                ways intended to generate negative and positive responses, such as
                the inclusion or omission of a smile. It was found that such changes
                affected ‘both the degree to which an individual is perceived to be
                fit  for  public  office  and  the  degree  to  which  he  is  perceived  to
                possess those qualities (competence, integrity and likableness) that
                other research has shown to be relevant to voters’ evaluations of
                political candidates’ (ibid., p. 37). Furthermore, even when subjects
                were made aware of the respective candidates’ policies on important
                issues, image as constructed by the photograph continued to exert
                an influence on voting intentions.
                  The researchers acknowledged the methodological limitations of
                their research, in so far as it was an artificial election with artificial
                candidates,  lacking  ‘the  social  context  and  duration  of  a  real
                campaign’ (ibid., p. 45), but claim that they were able to repeat the
                experiment with similar results, thus strengthening their validity.
                  Research  conducted  in  Germany  by  Kepplinger  and  Dombach
                indicated that certain camera angles, such as filming at eye level,
                produced a more favourable audience response to a politician than
                others. They concluded that ‘camera angles influence perception,
                particularly among a politician’s supporters’ (1987, p. 71).
                  Some  research  has  been  concerned  with  the  specific  effects  of
                different  media.  Scott  Keeter,  for  example,  has  found  that  of  all
                voters,  those  who  watched  television  were  the  most  likely  to  be
                influenced by the candidate’s ‘image’. He accepted, however, that
                this  may  not  be  ‘a  reaction  to  the  particular  stimuli  of  televised
                politics  –  although  such  a  direct  effect  is  plausible  –  as  a  more
                general  increase  in  the  importance  of  candidate  factors  resulting
                from various political changes in which television has played a role’
                (1987, p. 336).


                      THE EFFECT OF POLITICAL ADVERTISING

                We noted above the importance of distinguishing between types of
                political communication, such as election broadcasts and TV news
                interviews. If the candidate’s image and personality (as perceived by
                the audience) is an important factor in shaping voting behaviour so
                too, arguably, is the party’s political advertising. As we shall see in
                Chapter 6, advertising is a major component of modern political
                communication, consuming huge financial and creative resources
                during and between elections. The fact of parties’ expenditure on
                advertising  might  be  thought  to  point  to  evidence  that  it  works


                                            36
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62