Page 59 - An Introduction to Political Communication Third Edition
P. 59

POLITICS IN THE AGE OF MEDIATION

                examples of political communication, as judged by aesthetic criteria.
                Political communication can be directed, and increasingly is, by the
                burgeoning political public relations industry (see Chapters 6 and
                7).  Like  other  types  of  communicator,  the  politician  must  work
                within  conventions  which  are  known  and  understood  by  the
                audience. These conventions may be poorly executed, competently
                realised or creatively subverted, in the manner of aesthetic inno-
                vation through the ages. The political communicator is a performer,
                and will be judged by the audience, at least partly, on the quality of
                a performance.
                  It must not be forgotten, however, that an array of mediating
                factors  intervene  in  the  communicator–receiver  relationship,
                affecting  the  meaning  of  the  message  and  its  likely  impact  on
                attitudes  and  behaviour.  The  status  of  the  communicator  is
                important (incumbent president or outlawed terrorist?), as is the
                form of the message (advertisement, conference speech or terrorist
                act)  and  the  social  semiotics  of  its  reception.  One  could  have
                admired  the  communicative  abilities  of  Ronald  Reagan,  for
                example, although one’s position as an unemployed steelworker or
                environmentalist campaigner might have prevented acceptance of
                the  Reagan  ‘message’.  One  may  find  George  W.  Bush’s  rhetoric
                about ‘smoking out evil doers’ irritating, while agreeing with the
                need  to  defeat  terrorism  of  the  type  which  destroyed  the  World
                Trade Center. The politician can shape and work the message, but
                has relatively little control over the environment into which it is
                inserted and the uses to which it will be put.



                          POLITICAL COMMUNICATION AND
                              THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS

                An alternative to the empirical approach, with its emphasis on the
                effects of political communication on behaviour and attitudes, is
                to consider its impact on the democratic process itself. There is,
                undoubtedly,  something  qualitatively  different  about  a  political
                system in which the main means of communication are the mass
                media. Do these differences have negative or positive implications
                for the democratic ideal, as it was outlined in the previous chapter? 6
                Butler and Kavanagh observe that

                    more  than  ever,  election  campaigns  are  managed  and
                    orchestrated. Each party attempts to shape the agenda so


                                            38
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64