Page 63 - An Introduction to Political Communication Third Edition
P. 63

POLITICS IN THE AGE OF MEDIATION

                was able to book 4,500 poster sites, at a cost of £1.5 million, as
                compared to Labour’s 2,200 (cost, £0.5 million) and the Liberal
                Democrats’ 500 (cost, £0.17 million) (Butler and Kavanagh, 1992,
                p. 116). Campaign spending as a whole in 1992 was £10.1 million
                for  the  Tories,  £7.1  million  for  Labour,  and  £2.1  million  for
                the  Liberal  Democrats  (ibid.,  p.  260).  In  the  general  election  of
                1997,  the  figures  were  £13  million,  £17  million  and  £3  million
                respectively.
                  Criticisms of the rising costs of campaigning are, as one would
                expect, more likely to be heard from those with less rather than
                more  access  to  the  financial  and  other  resources  discussed  here.
                That does not invalidate them, of course, and following the 1997
                election the New Labour government introduced rules limiting each
                party’s campaign spending to £15 million.



                       THE COMMERCIALISATION OF POLITICS

                The  third  level  at  which  we  can  examine  the  impact  of  modern
                political communication is on the social system itself: the capitalist
                social  formation,  within  which  democracy  usually  comprises  the
                defining political element. An important tradition within sociology
                has argued that the growing role of mass communication in politics
                represents the extension of capitalist social relations – in particular,
                the relations of consumption – to the political sphere. In the process,
                politics has become artificial and degenerate. Jurgen Habermas has
                argued  that  ‘late  capitalism  brings  with  it  the  manipulation  of
                public opinion through the mass media, the forced articulation of
                social needs through large organisations, and in short, the manage-
                ment of politics by the “system” ’ (quoted in Pusey, 1978, p. 90).
                Using  different  language,  but  saying  essentially  the  same  thing,
                Herbert Schiller observes that in contemporary capitalism politicians
                ‘are  “sold”  to  the  public,  much  like  soap  and  automobiles.  .  .  .
                Issues of public policy, when considered at all, increasingly receive
                their  expression  and  discussion  in  thirty-second  commercials’
                (1984, p. 117). Robins and Webster suggest that the application of
                marketing and advertising techniques to the political process

                    signifies something about the conduct of political life [in
                    the  advanced  capitalist  world]:  Saatchi  and  Saatchi  [the
                    UK-based marketing and PR firm responsible for some of
                    the most innovative political advertising of the 1980s] is an


                                            42
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68