Page 64 - An Introduction to Political Communication Third Edition
P. 64

THE EFFECTS OF POLITICAL COMMUNICATION

                  index of the way in which politics has been changing to
                  become  a  matter  of  ‘selling’  ideas  and  ‘delivering’  up
                  voters; a sign that ‘scientific management’ has entered into
                  politics  and  market  values  have  permeated  deeper  into
                  social relations.
                                                         (1985, p. 53)

                 From this perspective, the notion that democracy has anything to
               do  with  rationality  and  ‘public  interest’  is  an  illusion,  since  we
               choose  our  politics  on  the  same  grounds,  and  as  a  result  of  the
               application of the same techniques of persuasion, as we choose our
               toothpaste. As Nicholas Garnham puts it in his discussion of the
               public sphere, the rise of political advertising and public relations
               expresses ‘the direct control of private or state interests of the flow
               of public information in the interest, not of rational discourse, but
               of  manipulation’  (1986,  p.  41).  The  rational  citizen  of  classical
               liberal theory has become ‘a consumer of politics and policies . . .
               the  competing  political  parties  [present]  electors  with  different
               policy  options  in  broadly  the  same  way  as  firms  [offer]  rival
               products to the consumers’ (Greenaway et al., 1992, p. 51).



                         POLITICS AND THE POST-MODERN

               To  this  argument  about  the  trivialisation  of  politics  and  the
               expulsion of rational discourse from the process may be added the
               ‘post-modernist’  variant,  in  which  political  communication  is
               viewed as the one-way exchange of empty signifiers and meaningless
               messages across a barren media landscape. An early pioneer of this
               apocalyptic view was Daniel Boorstin who, as noted in Chapter 2,
               coined  the  term  ‘pseudo-event’  in  response  to  what  he  saw  as
               the increasing tendency of the mass media to be preoccupied with
               unreal,  unauthentic,  manufactured  ‘happenings’,  or  ‘synthetic
               novelties’. His definition of a pseudo-event contained the following
               elements:

                  (a) It is not spontaneous, but comes about because some-
                  one  has  planned,  planted  or  incited  it;  (b)  It  is  planted
                  primarily for the immediate purpose of being reported or
                  reproduced.  Therefore,  its  occurrence  is  arranged  for
                  the convenience of the media. Its success is measured by
                  how  widely  it  is  reported.  Time  relations  in  it  are  more


                                          43
   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69