Page 45 - Analog and Digital Filter Design
P. 45

42      Analog and Digital Filter Design





                        known and the type of filter has been selected, the appropriate normalized fre-
                        quency response curve can be used to find the filter order required. The lowest
                        filter order to achieve the desired stopband attenuation is usually chosen because
                        the filter will be simpler and lower cost.

                        For example, if  the design must pass DC and signals up to a frequency F1, but
                        attenuate signals above frequency F2, a lowpass filter is required. The ratio of
                        F2 to F1 will be, by necessity, greater than one. Let’s say the frequency ratio is
                        2.0: the  passband  must  be  flat and the attenuation  required is 40dB. Graphs
                        showing the attenuation versus frequency for a number of filter orders are given
                        in this chapter; use the Butterworth response graph shown in Figure 2.10 to find
                        the required filter order. Since the plot is normalized, the frequency axis is equal
                        to the stopband to passband ratio in the final (denormalized) filter. For 40dB
                        attenuation at o = 2 (the frequency ratio is equal to two), the required filter order
                        is seven (n = 7).

                        In  this  example  a  Butterworth  response  was  used  because  it  has  a  smooth
                        passband. Other responses also have a smooth passband: these are the Bessel
                        and the Inverse Chebyshev. The Bessel response does not have sufficient atten-
                        uation  at a  frequency ratio of  two, no  matter  how  high the  filter order. The
                        Inverse Chebyshev response would require a fifth-order filter, to give 40 dB atten-
                        uation, but practically would be more difficult to make. This chapter will provide
                        the  designer  with  the  information  so  that  he  or  she  can  make  the  correct
                        approach.
                        The most popular  responses will  be described in more detail later. In Chapter
                        1, the passband  and stopband of  a filter were described. The frequencies that
                        are intended  to pass through the filter with very little loss determine the pass-
                        band. Those frequencies where a certain level of  attenuation is required deter-
                        mine the stopband. There are four basic responses that can be made from the
                        combination  of  flat  or  rippled  passband  and  smooth  or  rippled  stopband.
                        I will  show how standard Bessel, Butterworth, Chebyshev, Cauer, and Inverse
                        Chebyshev approximations have one of these responses. Graphs will be used to
                        describe the shape of each frequency response.

                        The subject of  Inverse Chebyshev filters will be covered in some detail. In par-
                        ticular I will show how to obtain a more practical 3dB cutoff point, rather than
                        have the filter normalized at the stopband. I will also give tables for third- and
                        fifth-order passive filters.

                        Practical filters are characterized by passband, stopband, and skirt response, as
                        shown in Figure 2.1. The passband is the region where the loss is less than at
                        the cutoff point. If the cutoff point is at, say, 1 dB, then all frequencies at which
                        the loss is lower than  1 dB are in the passband. The stopband is the region of
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50