Page 84 - Analog and Digital Filter Design
P. 84

Time and Frequency Response    81




                      The third column gives the order of  a Cauer filter that will meet the specifica-
                      tion. In some cases the specification will be exceeded.



                The Cutoff Frequency

                       There are two schools of  thought concerning the cutoff frequency. The purists
                       would say that it depends upon the filter design. The Butterworth response has
                      a natural cutoff  frequency at the point  where signal loss through  the filter is
                       3dB. However, Chebyshev and Cauer filters have a natural cutoff at the point
                      where the attenuation is equal to the passband ripple. Bessel filters are designed
                      from their group delay characteristics, so their natural cutoff point depends on
                       the filter order. Inverse Chebyshev filters have a natural frequency at the edge
                      of  the stopband,  because their  response is  derived from inverting Chebyshev
                       pole positions.

                       My view is that a 3dB cutoff point should be  used for all filter responses. All
                       filters can be  normalized  to have  a 3dB cutoff  frequency by  suitable scaling.
                      This gives  some consistency and  allows a direct comparison  of  performance
                      to be made.  It also makes sense from an engineering perspective because the
                       transmitted power is halved at this point. An example where this is used is in a
                      diplexer. A diplexer comprises two filters that are connected together, and each
                       one is required to have a 3 dB cutoff frequency in order for the overall response
                       to  be  correct.  Diplexers are described further  in  Chapter  8  and  are used  for
                       frequency band separation of  signals.


                 References


                       1.    Weinberg, L. “Additional Tables for Design of  Optimum Ladder
                             Networks.” Journal of the Franklin Institute, August 1957: 127-1 38.
                       2.    Huelsman, L. P.  Active und Passive  Analog Filter  Design. New York:
                             McGraw-Hill, 1993.
                       3.    Zverev, A. I. Handbook of Filter Synthesis. New York: John Wiley &
                             Sons, 1967.

                      4.     Amstutz, P. “Elliptic Approximation and Elliptic Filter Design on
                             Small Computers.” IEEE Circuits and Systems, vol. CAS-25, no. 12.
                             December 1978: 1001-101 1.
                       5.    Cuthbert, Thomas R. Circuit Design  Using Personal  Computers. New
                            York: John Wiley & Sons, 1983.
                       6.    Baez-Lopez, David. “Synthesis and Sensitivity Analysis of  Elliptical
                             Networks.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of  Arizona,  1979.
   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89