Page 256 - Analysis and Design of Energy Geostructures
P. 256

Thermohydromechanical behaviour of soils and soil structure interfaces  231


                   Table 5.1 Thermal collapse (volumetric contraction) of different clayey soils induced by a
                   temperature change at constant mean effective stress under normally consolidated conditions.
                   Authors          Clay type     T 0   T 1    ΔT    Thermal  I p  ε v   ε v / C

                                                  [ C]  [ C]   [ C]  Cycle   [%]   [%]   [%/ C]




                   Demars and Charles  Atlantic Marine 25  50  25    Yes     25    1.24  0.049
                     (1982)           clay
                                    Atlantic Marine 25  50     25    Yes     84.7 1.08   0.043
                                      clay
                                    Atlantic Marine 25  50     25    Yes     66.9 0.68   0.027
                                      clay
                                    Atlantic Marine 25  50     25    Yes     30.8 0.64   0.025
                                      clay
                   Paaswell (1967)  Penn soil     30    60     30    No       8.9 1      0.033
                   Campanella and   Remoulded     5     60     55    Yes     47    0.95  0.017
                     Mitchell (1968)  illite
                   Plum and Esrig   Illite        24    50     26    No      84    1.1   0.042
                     (1969)
                   Hueckel and Baldi  Boom clay   22    80     58    Yes     25    1.8   0.031
                     (1990)         Pontida clay
                   Towhata et al.   MC clay       20    90     70    No      25    1.66  0.023
                     (1993)
                                    MC clay       20    90     70    No      29    1.08  0.015
                                    MC clay       20    90     70    No      29    1.26  0.018
                   Del Olmo et al.  Spanish clay  20    100    80    Yes     23    1.08  0.013
                     (1996)
                   Robinet et al.   Parisian Basin  20  80     60    Yes     30    0.69  0.011
                     (1997)           clay
                   Burghignoli et al.  Todi clay  22    48     26    Yes     14.4 0.95   0.036
                     (2000)
                   Sultan et al. (2002)  Boom clay  22  100    78    Yes     30    3.5   0.044
                   Laloui and       Kaolin clay   20    95     75    No      23    0.85  0.011
                     Cekerevac
                     (2003)
                   Abuel-Naga et al.  Bangkok clay  22  90     68    Yes     60    5.6   0.082
                     (2007)
                   Correlation with the plasticity index of the soil. Thermal cycle: Yes: heating cooling cycle; No: only heating.
                   Source: Data from François, B., 2008. Thermoplasticity of Fine Grained Soils At Various Saturation States: Application
                   to Nuclear Waste Disposal (Ph.D. thesis), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland


                   expansion coefficient that is lower than or equal to that of the embedded geostruc-
                   tures. Such a sensitivity should be considered when soils characterised by a greater
                   thermal expansion coefficient than the one characterising geostructures may be
                   encountered and in any case when dealing with fine-grained soils under NC condi-
                   tions or particularly sensitive to time-dependent effects such as creep. According to
   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261