Page 333 - Anthropometry, Apparel Sizing and Design
P. 333

326                                     Anthropometry, Apparel Sizing and Design


          Table 12.2 ANOVA test to compare differences between three foot parameters
          Foot                     Sum of            Mean
          parameters               squares    df     square     F       Sig.

          Foot length    Between     4135.038    2   2067.519   13.254  0.000
                           groups
                         Within    188283.066  1207
                           groups
                         Total     192418.104  1209   155.993
          Ball girth     Between     5823.439    2   2911.720   13.099  0.000
            circumference  groups
                         Within    268306.217  1207   222.292
                           groups
                         Total     274129.657  1209
          Foot breadth   Between      818.864    2    409.432   10.291  0.000
                           groups
                         Within     48020.018  1207    39.785
                           groups
                         Total      48838.883  1209




         12.4.2 Result in ANOVA and post hoc test for three foot
                  dimension

         Table 12.2 shows the results of ANOVA test to compare the differences of the three
         foot dimensions between the three major ethnic groups. The results clearly show sig-
         nificant differences among ethnic groups with P<.05. Table 12.3 also shows the post
         hoc Tukey test, which shows that only the foot length was significantly different
         between all the ethnic groups. Concerning ball girth, significant differences were
         found between Chinese and Malays (P<.05), but no significant differences were
         noted between all three ethnic groups. Meanwhile, there was a significant difference
         in the foot breadth of Malays compared with Chinese and Indians (P<.05). However,
         there was no significant difference between the Chinese and Indians. The post hoc
         Tukey test showed that there exists a significant difference between all the ethnic
         groups for FL, FB, and BG. These results can help the footwear industry to produce
         shoes that meet customer demands.
            The results of ANOVA test and post hoc Tukey test for the three ethnic groups
         show that Indian women have longer FL compared with other ethnic groups. How-
         ever, Malaysian women have a wider FB and a higher BG. The results show that
         Indian women have a slimmer foot shape than Malaysian and Chinese women. Mean-
         while, Malaysian women have larger foot shape compared with Chinese and Indian
         women. The morphology of foot shape is important for the development the new stan-
         dard shoe sizing system for the multiethnic groups in Malaysia.
   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338