Page 131 - Applied Petroleum Geomechanics
P. 131

Rock strengths and rock failure criteria  123


                               s 1 þs 2 þs 3
              where s oct ¼ s m ¼     . It can be seen that the DruckerePrager crite-
                                  3
              rion, Eq. (3.52), is a specific form of Eq. (3.65)
                 Mogi (1971) plotted his experimental data for the Dunham dolomite
              and the Mizuho trachyte and found that s oct and s m,2 have a single
              monotonically rising curve for each rock, i.e.,

                                        s oct ¼ g 1 ðs m;2 Þ             (3.66)
                          s 1 þs 3
              where s m;2 ¼
                            2
                 Eq. (3.66) was used to fit the KTB amphibolite and the Westerly granite
              as a monotonically increasing power function (Haimson and Chang, 2000;
              Haimson, 2006) as the following form:
                                         s oct ¼ As B                    (3.67)
                                                 m;2
              where A and B are the fitting parameters. If the stress unit is in MPa, then
              for the KTB amphibolite the parameters are A ¼ 1.77 and B ¼ 0.86; for
              the Westerly granite A ¼ 1.51 and B ¼ 0.89 (Haimson, 2006).
                 Alternately, the linear Mogi model can be used for true triaxial data of
              rocks, which also provides a good fit and is easier to use:
                                                                         (3.68)
                                       s oct ¼ a þ bs m;2
              where a and b are the fitting parameters. Table 3.2 shows the values of a and
              b obtained from several true triaxial tests in different rocks.
                 Some new failure criteria for true triaxial strength criteria have been
              proposed (e.g., You, 2009; Ma et al., 2017). However, for the conventional
              triaxial tests (s 2 ¼ s 3 ), the octahedral shear stress can be simplified into the
              following form:
                              1  q ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi 2
                                                      2
                                          2
                         s oct ¼  ðs 1   s 2 Þ þðs 1   s 3 Þ þðs 3   s 1 Þ
                              3
                               p ffiffiffi                                     (3.69)
                                2
                            ¼     ðs 1   s 3 Þ
                               3
              Table 3.2 The values of a and b obtained from true triaxial tests.
              Rock type        a (MPa)  b       Reference

              KTB amphibolite  40.1     0.636   Haimson (2006)
              Westerly granite  30.19   0.712   Haimson (2006)
              Mancos shale     10.779   0.5857  Vachaparampil and Ghassemi (2013)
              Barnett shale    36.542   0.4807  Vachaparampil and Ghassemi (2013)
              Eagle ford shale  30.412  0.5634  Vachaparampil and Ghassemi (2013)
   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136