Page 181 - Applied Petroleum Geomechanics
P. 181

In situ stress regimes with lithology-dependent and depletion effects  175


              new equations is that Poisson’s ratio of the rock is much easier to be
              obtained than the coefficient of friction of the fault.
              5.3.4 Lithology-dependent minimum and maximum
                    horizontal stresses
              To illustrate the relationship between lithology and horizontal stresses, the
              minimum and maximum horizontal stresses can be schematically plotted in
              Fig. 5.9 based on the explanation in the previous sections. It can be
              observed in Fig. 5.9A that in normal faulting regime, a sandstone normally
              has a smaller minimum horizontal stress because of its smaller Poisson’s
              ratio. By contrast, a shale has a higher minimum horizontal stress. There-
              fore, the shale can be used as a barrier of hydraulic fracture propagation
              when hydraulic fracturing is performed in the adjacent sandstone (Zhang
              et al., 2018). It should be noted that in the strike-slip and reverse faulting
              stress regimes, this lithology-dependent effect in the horizontal stresses may
              be smaller (Fig. 5.9B and C) or even reverse because of the larger tectonic
              stresses. In highly tectonically stressed environment both the minimum and
              maximum horizontal stresses can approach or exceed the overburden stress,
              and tectonic strain effect on the sandstone/shale sequence becomes
              significant (Blanton and Olson, 1999). Therefore, in strong tectonic
              compressional settings, a mechanically stiffer formation (with higher
              Young’s modulus), commonly a sandstone, may be more stressed by the
              tectonic stresses than a softer formation, such as a shale. The following
              equation can be used to illustrate the impact of the tectonic strains on the
              horizontal stresses:
                                            E
                                   s x tect ¼   ðε x þ nε y Þ            (5.19)
                                          1   n 2
              (A)                 (B)                    (C)
                             Stress              Stress                Stress
               shale                shale                 shale
              sandstone            sandstone             sandstone
               shale  σ h σ H  σ σ V   shale  σ h  σ V   σ H  shale  σ V  σ h  σ H

              sandstone            sandstone             sandstone
               shale                shale                 shale
               shale                shale                 shale
               Depth               Depth                 Depth
              Figure 5.9 Schematic representation of the lithology-dependent horizontal stresses in
              three different faulting stress regimes: (A) Normal faulting; (B) Strike-slip faulting; and
              (C) Reverse faulting.
   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186