Page 199 - Applied Petroleum Geomechanics
P. 199

194   Applied Petroleum Geomechanics


          DFIT, mini-frac and wireline tests, or LWD micro-frac tests (Ramakrishnan
          et al., 2009). In a hydraulic fracture test, an interval of borehole is isolated and
          sealed with inflatable packers as shown in Fig. 6.3. In a typical LOT, it is simpler
          than the one presented in Fig. 6.3 because the casing in the borehole seals the
          shallower formations; therefore, only the hole below the casing and any new
          formation drilled before the test are exposed (Edwardsetal.,2002). The fluid is
          then pumped into the hole with a constant flowrate. The pressure increase in
          the hole is typically linear as long as there are no leaks in the system, and the
          exposed formation is not highly permeable. As the pressure increases at some
          point, the rate of pressure increase varies such that the pressureetime curve
          departs from linearity (Fig. 6.4). This departure from linearity is the fracture
          initiation pressure (p i ).
             After departure from linearity, pressure is typically seen to increase at a
          lower rate until a maximum pressure is reached, and this pressure is the
          formation breakdown pressure (p b ). After the rock is broken down
          (i.e., major hydraulic fracture is created), at some point the pressure in the
          hole levels off and remains fairly constant (p prop ) at the same flowrate.
          During this stage, the fracture is propagating (Zhang and Roegiers, 2010).


























          Figure 6.3 Outline of the principal components of a hydraulic fracturing stress mea-
          surement. A test interval along the borehole is isolated by two inflatable packers. The
          pressure in the interval is then increased by pumping fluid in. The induced fracture
          extends successively with each of three pressurization cycles in the direction of the
          maximum horizontal stress S H and opens against the minimum horizontal stress S h
          (Schmitt et al., 2012).
   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204