Page 76 - Applied Probability
P. 76

4
                              Hypothesis Testing and
                              Categorical Data

                              4.1 Introduction

                              Most statistical geneticists are frequentists, and fairly traditional ones at
                              that. In testing statistical hypotheses, they prefer pure significance tests
                              or likelihood ratio tests based on large sample theory. Although one could
                              easily dismiss this conservatism as undue reverence for Karl Pearson and
                              R. A. Fisher, it is grounded in the humble reality of geneticists’ inability
                              to describe precise alternative hypotheses and to impose convincing priors.
                              In the first part of this chapter, we will review by way of example the large
                              sample methods summarized so admirably by Cavalli-Sforza and Bodmer
                              [6], Elandt-Johnson [11], and Weir [44]. Then we will move on to modern
                              elaborations of frequentist tests for contingency tables. Part of the nov-
                              elty here is in designing tests sensitive to certain types of departures from
                              randomness. Permutation procedures permit approximation of the exact
                              p-values for these tests and consequently relieve our anxieties about large
                              sample approximations [28].





                              4.2 Hypotheses About Genotype Frequencies

                              An obvious question of interest to a geneticist is whether a trait satisfies
                              Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in a particular population. If the trait is not in
                              Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, then two explanations are possible. First, the
                              genetic model for the trait may be incorrect. For instance, a one-locus model
                              is inappropriate for a two-locus trait. If the model is basically correct, then
                              the further population assumptions necessary for Hardy-Weinberg equilib-
                              rium may not be met. Thus, forces such as selection and migration may be
                              distorting the Hardy-Weinberg proportions.
                                Our aim in this section is to discuss simple likelihood methods for testing
                              Hardy-Weinberg proportions. We emphasize likelihood ratio tests rather
                              than the usual chi-square tests. The two types of tests are similar, but
                              likelihood ratio tests extend more naturally to other statistical settings. Our
                              exposition assumes familiarity with basic notions of large sample theory.
                              Many books cover the essentials. At an elementary level we recommend
                              [31] and at an advanced level [14, 26, 36].
   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81