Page 148 - APPLIED PROCESS DESIGN FOR CHEMICAL AND PETROCHEMICAL PLANTS, Volume 1, 3rd Edition
P. 148

134                      Applied Process Design for Chemical and Petrochemical Plants
                                                       1 .o
                                                        8
                                                        6
                                                        5
                                                        4
                                                        3



             Figure  2-47.  Acceptable  pressure  losses
             between the  vacuum  vessel  and the vacuum
             pump.  Note:  reference sections on  figure  to
             system diagram to illustrate the sectional type
             hook-ups for connecting lines. Use 60% of the
             pressure loss read as acceptable loss for the
             system from process to vacuum pump, for ini-
             tial estimate. P = pressure drop (torr) of line in   2
             question;  Po = operating pressure of  vacuum
             process equipment, absolute, torr. By permis-
             sion,  Ryans, J.  L.  and  Roper,  D.  L.,  Process   0.011  I  1  I I IIII I IIII  I  I  I I1111 I Ill1  I  I  I I1111 I1111
                                                                                                     2
             Vacuum System Design & Operation, McGraw-   1     2   3  4  567810   2   3  4  5678100     3  4  56781000
             Hill Book Co.,  Inc., 1986 [18].                                Pressure in vacuum vessel Po

             Fanning  or  Moody  friction  charts  and  are  beyond  the   used as the viscosity factor in the pressure  drop calcula-
             scope  of  this  chapter.  Design  literature  is  very  limited,   tions. The two principal classifications are [25]:
             with some of  the current available references being Sul-
             tan  [21], Bird et al.  [22], Cheremisinoff, N. P. and Gupta   1. Newtonian slurries are simple rheological property
             [ 141, Perry et al.  [5], and Brodkey and Hershey [23].   viscosities, and can be treated as true fluids as long
                                                                       as  the  flowing velocity is  sufficient to  prevent  the
             Slurry Flow in Process Plant Piping                       dropout of solids. For this type of slurry, the viscosi-
                                                                       ty  = P.
               Most industrial process plants have from none to a few   2. Bingham-plastic slurries require  a  shear  stress dia-
             slurry flow lines  to  transport  process fluids. The  more   gram showing shear rate vs. shear stress for the slurry
             common slurry lines discussed in the literature deal with   in  order to determine  the  coefficient of  rigidity, q,
             long  transmission  lines  for  coal/water,  mine  tailings/   which is the slope of the plot at a particular concen-
             water, limestone/water,  wood  pulp-fibers/water,  gravel/   tration. This is laboratory data requiring a rheometer.
             water, and others. These lines usually can be expected to   These are usually fine solids at high concentrations.
             have flow characteristics somewhat different than in-plant
             process slurries. Considerable study has been made of the   Reference  [25] has two practical in-plant design exam-
             subject, with the result that the complexity of the variables   ples worked out.
             make  correlation  of  all  data  difficult,  especially when   The pressure drop design method of Turian and Yuan
             dealing with short transfer lines. For this reason, no single   [24] is the development of the analysis of a major litera-
             design method is summarized here, but rather reference   ture  data  review.  The  method  categorizes  slurry  flow
             is given to the methods that appear most promising  (also   regimes  similar in  concept  to  the  conventional  multi-
             see Reference  [30]).                                 regime diagram for two-phase flow, Figure 2-50. Their fric-
                Derammelaere and Wasp  [25] present  a design tech-   tion factor correlations are specific to the calculated flow
             nique  that ties into their classification of  slurries as het-   regime. See Figure 2-51 for one of four typical plots in the
             erogeneous and homogeneous  (Figures 2-48  and 2-49).   original reference.
             This method uses the Fanning friction factor and conven-   Example  calculations  are  included,  and  Figure  2-52
             tional  equations for  pressure  drop.  The recommended   illustrates the effect of pipe size on the placement of the
             design slurry velocities range from 4 to '7 ft/sec. Pipe abra-   flow regime.
             sion can be a problem for some types of solids when the
             velocity approaches 10 ft/sec. For velocities below 4 ft/sec    Pressure Drop for Flashing Liquids
             there  can  be  a  tendency for  solids to  settle and create
             blockage and plugging of the line.                      Steam is  the  most  common  liquid  that  is  flashed  in
                The concentration  of  the  solids in  the  slurry  deter-   process plants,  but  of  course,  it is  not the  only one  as
             mines  the  slurry rheology or viscosity.  This  property  is   many  processes  utilize  flash  operations  of  pure  com-
   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153