Page 310 - Applied Process Design For Chemical And Petrochemical Plants Volume II
P. 310

Packed Towers




















                                                                                     Figute  9-26.  SLE  Data  Chart  for  1-in.
                                                                                     metal Pall rings, aqueous systems, pres-
                                                                                     sure drop only.  Data from  15-84 in.  dia.
                                                                                     test columns with packed heights of 2-1 0
                                                                                     ft.  Reproduced with  permission of  the
                                          FLOW  PARAMETER                            American Institute of Chemical Engineers,
                                                                                     Kister, H. 2. and Gill, D. R.,  Chemical Engi-
             Basis:  Fp-56                                                           neering Progress,  V.  87,  No.  2  0 (1991)
             Pressure  drop  measured in Inthas HZO/ft                               p. 32; all rights reserved.




















           Figure 9-27. SLE Data Chart for 2-in. metal
           Pall rings, aqueous systems, pressure drop
           only.  Data from 30-84 in. dia. test columns
           with  packed  heights of  2-18  ft.  Repro-
           duced  with  permission of  the  American
           Institute of Chemical Engineers, Kister, H.
           2. and  Gill,  D.  R.,  Chemical Engineering
           Progress,  V.  87,  No.  2 0 (1991),  p.  32; all   Basis: Fp47
           rights reserved.                    Prwurr drop mroaund In  Inrhra H20/ft


           valuable key design and operational points related to Fig-   Prediction of  Maximum Operating Capacity (MOC)
           ure 9-22.
             For design, select C, above the loading point C (on Fig-   Su-igle [94]  proposed this term to better describe the
           ure 9-22) and below the maximum efficiency rate, point D.   performance of a packed column at or near the previous-
           Usually, the flow at point C is 70 to 75% of that at maxi-   ly described “loading point.” Kister [93] evaluated the lim-
           mum point F [94]. The design C,  (point E) should allow at   ited published data and proposed using the MOC at 95%
           least 15% increase in rates before reaching the maximum   of the flood point. The flood point can be estimated by
           operating capacity of  the  packing. This allows for usual   Equation 9-20 or from the plots in References 90 and 93.
           variation in operations [94]. The design C, value should be   The data are reported to be within 15-20%  of the predic-
           at least 80 to 85% of the maximum operational C,  (MOC)   tion  [93]. See Figure 9-22 for the identification of  MOC
           for the best turn-down condition during operation.    on the HETP vs. C, chart. For more accurate information
   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315