Page 354 - Applied Statistics And Probability For Engineers
P. 354

c09.qxd  5/15/02  8:02 PM  Page 302 RK UL 9 RK UL 9:Desktop Folder:






               302     CHAPTER 9 TESTS OF HYPOTHESES FOR A SINGLE SAMPLE


               EXAMPLE 9-6       The increased availability of light materials with high strength has revolutionized the design and
                                 manufacture of golf clubs, particularly drivers. Clubs with hollow heads and very thin faces can
                                 result in much longer tee shots, especially for players of modest skills. This is due partly to the
                                 “spring-like effect” that the thin face imparts to the ball. Firing a golf ball at the head of the club
                                 and measuring the ratio of the outgoing velocity of the ball to the incoming velocity can quantify
                                 this spring-like effect. The ratio of velocities is called the coefficient of restitution of the club. An
                                 experiment was performed in which 15 drivers produced by a particular club maker were selected
                                 at random and their coefficients of restitution measured. In the experiment the golf balls were
                                 fired from an air cannon so that the incoming velocity and spin rate of the ball could be precisely
                                 controlled. It is of interest to determine if there is evidence (with 	  0.05) to support a claim that
                                 the mean coefficient of restitution exceeds 0.82. The observations follow:
                                                    0.8411  0.8191  0.8182  0.8125  0.8750
                                                    0.8580  0.8532  0.8483  0.8276  0.7983
                                                    0.8042  0.8730  0.8282  0.8359  0.8660
                                 The sample mean and sample standard deviation are x   0.83725  and s   0.02456. The normal
                                 probability plot of the data in Fig. 9-9 supports the assumption that the coefficient of restitution is
                                 normally distributed. Since the objective of the experimenter is to demonstrate that the mean co-
                                 efficient of restitution exceeds 0.82, a one-sided alternative hypothesis is appropriate.
                                    The solution using the eight-step procedure for hypothesis testing is as follows:
                                    1.  The parameter of interest is the mean coefficient of restitution,  .
                                    2.  H :    0.82
                                         0
                                    3.  H :    0.82 . We want to reject H if the mean coefficient of restitution exceeds 0.82.
                                                                   0
                                         1
                                    4.  	  0.05
                                    5.  The test statistic is
                                                                     x 
  0
                                                                 t
                                                                  0
                                                                      s
 1n
                                    6.  Reject H if t   t 0.05,14    1.761
                                                  0
                                               0




                                   99
                                   95
                                   90
                                   80
                                   70
                                  Percentage  60
                                   50
                                   40
                                   30
                                   20
                                   10
               Figure 9-9.  Normal  5
               probability plot of the
                                    1
               coefficient of restitu-
               tion data from        0.78              0.83              0.88
               Example 9-6.                         Coefficient of restitution
   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359