Page 116 - Assurance of Sterility for Sensitive Combination Products and Materials
P. 116

100   Assurance of sterility for sensitive combination products and materials


            validate those tests, scientists and regulators concluded that integrity testing
          of seals and closures and separate microbial barrier testing of porous mate-
          rials is significantly more reliable [49, 50].
             Tallentire and Sinclair developed a fundamental understanding of the
          penetration of particulates in narrow channels. By correlating particu-
          lates and spores, they concluded, that microbial barrier performance can
          be predicted when testing with particles instead of spores [51, 52]. This
          created the  basis  for  the  development  of ASTM  F2638  [53].  Herman
          and Larsen gave an excellent overview on these developments [54]. After
          the method was recognized by the FDA in 2013 [55], DuPont used it
          extensively for equivalence testing comparing data of “transition” Tyvek
          produced on the newer manufacturing lines and” legacy” Tyvek pro-
          duced on the older manufacturing lines within the framework of the
          medical packaging transition project. The method is accepted by many
          authorities such as Health Canada, notified bodies in Europe, CFDA in
          China, and others.
             Research in whole package testing is still active, despite the issues de-
          scribed above to validate these methods (see Dunkelberg et al. [56–58] or
          Severin et al. [59]). Current research explores the challenges of microbial
          ingress testing from aerosolization. The goal of this research is to arrive at
          a barrier method that allows the user to control the other variables such as
          pressure, humidity, and temperature. This ability allows the user to design
          experiments to qualify their packaging systems under ‘real-life’ conditions.
          The main challenge to this research is the variation of the input variables
          such as specific organisms, as well as process variables such as microbial
          growth and recovery. While variability is an issue, the inability to detect
          critical size holes continues to be the main issue for validation. With new
          technologies, research will probably continue, however, these methods will
          likely remain fundamental research tools rather than useful tests for packag-
          ing validation purposes.

          5.3.3.4  Seal strength test methods
          Seal strength is a critical quality attribute for the validation and control of
          sealing processes. Meeting a defined mechanical strength of seals can be
          important for compatibility with sterilization processes, and is certainly im-
          portant for a package being able to withstand the stresses of transport and
          handling. Two test methods are mainly used in the industry, ASTM F88 [60]
          and according to the annex D in EN 868-5 [61] which will also refer to
          ASTM F88 in its new version (Fig. 5.6 and Table 5.6).
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121