Page 264 - Automated Fingerprint Identification Systems (AFIS)
P. 264

CASE STUDY—DIAMONDS IN THE ROUGH          249



                                                                                  Table 10.2
           Year                                         Number of Identifications  Annual Latent Print
                                                                                  Identifications
           1995                                         1,011
           1996                                         1,033
           1997                                          971
           1998                                         1,015
           1999                                         1,292
           2000                                         1,549
           2001                                         2,004





          matchers and coders in the spring of 1999. By the fall of 1999, the entire latent
          cog (TPlc) database had been reconverted. Within 1 month of the installation
          of this new database, the first of the two lists of cases on the UL file was pre-
          pared and distributed. Meetings with latent print examiners were held across
          the state to explain the process and opportunities. Note that in Table 10.2 there
          is a nearly 30% improvement in the number of latent print identifications from
          1999 to 2000.
            By the spring of 2000, the second list of cases on the unsolved latent file had
          been prepared and distributed. As with the distribution of the first list, face-to-
          face meetings of latent print examiners and supervisors were held to explain
          the process and answer questions. For the year 2000, latent print examiners
          using SAFIS made over 2,000 latent print identifications!


          10.6 SUMMARY

          The reasons for the improvements can be summarized in a statement made by
          Richard Higgins, former Chief of Criminal Identification for the New York State
          Division of Criminal Justice Services, “The name of the game is idents, idents,
          idents.” By embracing this philosophy, DCJS managers sought to provide not
          just an adequate Statewide Automated Fingerprint Identification System, but
          the best Statewide Automated Fingerprint Identification System. The improve-
          ments did not end with upgrading the technology. Managers also examined
          methods of harnessing the power of SAFIS to make faster identifications, to
          better interface with the CCH file, and to pass along this information on sub-
          mitting agencies. Managers also worked closely with latent print examiners and
          supervisors to provide them with the tools and knowledge to use SAFIS to
          produce more identifications.
            The identification process is a people process (see Table 10.3). A booking
          officer captures an inked impression on a tenprint card or rolls the subject’s
          fingers across a glass platen. Evidence technicians search crime scenes for latent
   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269