Page 177 - Automotive Engineering Powertrain Chassis System and Vehicle Body
P. 177

Hybrid vehicle design     CHAPTER 7.1

































           Fig. 7.1-4 Justifying the hybrid: (a) EV traffic potential; (b) combined series–parallel mode.


           7.1.3 Hybrid technology case                       available the best answer is to use a hybrid-drive line
                                                              consisting of a small battery, a 45 kW electric drive, and
           studies
                                                              a 22.5 kW engine. This solution would increase the
                                                              vehicle weight from 750 kg to 860 kg, but it would now
           7.1.3.1 The hybrid electric solution for           accelerate from 0 to 60 mph in 8 seconds. In addition,
           small cars                                         the vehicle will have automatic transmission with re-
                                                              generative braking, could operate in electric-only mode
                        4
           Ron Hodkinson points out that US President Bill Clin-  with a 30 mile range for use in zero emission mode in city
           ton’s initiative for the American family car sets the target  centres, and could be recharged from a wall socket or
           that, in 2003, cars will run for 100 miles on one US gallon  charging point if desired.
           of unleaded gasoline. The objectives are reduced fuel  The Polaron subsidiary, Nelco, worked with Wych-
           consumption, reduced imported oil dependency, and  wood Engineering and Midwest Aero Engines on a paral-
           reduced pollution to improve air quality. Can it be done?  lel hybrid replacement for a front-wheel drive train in
           The answer is yes. Work carried out on GM’s ultra-light-  family cars and delivery vans, Fig. 7.1-5.
           weight car programme involved composite structure to
           achieve a body weight of 450 kg, drag coefficient C d < 0.2
           by means of streamliningthe underside of the car, reduced  7.1.3.3 Rotary engine with PM motor,
                             2
           frontal area (<1.5 m ), conventional drive train with  the mechanical outlines
           a 30 bhp two-stroke orbital engine and low-rolling-re-
           sistance tyres. Overall, this leads to a vehicle weight of  The drive line is a marriage of two techniques: a
           750 kg, a 400 kg payload at a top speed of 80 mph and an  permanent-magnet brushless DC motor and a Wankel
           acceleration of 0–60 mph in 20 seconds. This illustrates  two-stroke engine. The electric motor provides instant
           the dilemma. Reduce the engine size to improve the fuel  acceleration with 45 kWof power available from 1500 to
           consumption, and the acceleration performance is   6000 rpm, on this design. A permanent-magnet design is
           sacrificed.
                                                              used because it is lightweight, highly efficient, and results
                                                              in an economical inverter. The concept is to exploit the
           7.1.3.2 Hybrid power pack, a better                machine characteristics using vector control. At low
           solution                                           speeds, the permanent magnets provide the motor field.
                                                              At high speeds, the field is weakened by introducing
           In the long term we may use electric vehicles using fly-  a reactive Id component at right angles to the torque-
           wheel storage or fuel cells. Until these systems are  producing component Iq. The control objective is to


                                                                                                      179
   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182