Page 618 - Automotive Engineering Powertrain Chassis System and Vehicle Body
P. 618

Design and material utilization   C HAPTER 18.1


            Table 18.1-3 Body-in-white cost analysis presented by Dieffenbach 14

                                     Steel          Aluminium      Steel            Aluminium      Composite
                                     unibody        unibody        spaceframe       spaceframe     monocoque
            Body-in-white cost analysis: key design inputs for selected case study alternatives

            Geometry
            Overall vehicle
            mass (kg)                315            188            302              188            235
            Mass as % of steel unibody  100%        60%            96%              60%            75%

            Spot joints (#)          3250           3400                            1000           n/a
            Seam joints (cm)         n/a            n/a            4000                            6000
            Piece count
            Total piece count (#)    204            224            137              137            41
            Count as % of steel unibody  100%       110%           67%              67%            20%

            Number of stampings      187            207            40               40             n/a
            Number of castings       n/a            n/a            30               30             n/a
            Number of roll/          n/a            n/a            50               n/a            n/a
            hydroformings

            Number of extrusions     n/a            n/a            n/a              50             n/a
            Number of mouldings      n/a            n/a            n/a              n/a            7
            Number of foam cores     n/a            n/a            n/a              n/a            34
            Panels (inners/outers)   17             17             17               17             17

            Materials
            Material prices ($/kg)   $0.77–0.92     $3.00–3.50     $0.77–2.20       $2.00–3.00     $3.13
                           3
            Material density (g/cm )  7.85          2.70           7.85             2.70           1.59
                                     Stamping       Casting        Hydro-forming    Extrusion      Moulding
            Body-in-white cost analysis: key fabrication input for selected case study alternatives
            Range of cycle times (s)  8–12          50–60          30–40            3–10           600–1200

            Range of labourers/fab’n line  4–6      2              2                2              2
            Range of machine costs ($M)  $1.3–7.5   $0.8–1.5       $1.0–2.0         $1.0–2.0       $0.5–1.0
            Range of tool set costs ($M)  $0.2–6.0  $0.1–0.2       $0.1–0.5         $3k–7k         $0.1–$1.2





           influence. Thus the trends shown in Table 18.1-3 are  higher volumes the steel unibody shows the lowest cost.
           mirrored in these studies with steel characterized by high  The aluminium spaceframes or unibody do not show
           investment cost, lower material and faster production  a cost advantage although the aluminium spaceframe
           rate. Conversely moulded plastic has a lower investment  competes fairly well (a 15 per cent cost penalty) and
           cost, higher material cost and slower production rate. The  compares with the steel unibody at high volumes. For
           composite monocoque has the lowest cost up to about  outer panel assembly sets compression moulded SMC has
           30 000 vehicles per year; from 30 000 to 60 000 vehicles  the lowest cost for volumes up to about 100 000 sets per
           per year the steel spaceframe shows the lowest cost. For  year above which steel has the lowest costs.


                                                                                                     629
   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623