Page 155 - Basic Gas Chromatography

141 Wiley, NY, Dekker, NY, 24, Third Brown, (1986). 1984, Am.
Ed., Dekker, Ed., Dekker, Chromatography, Vol. Wilmington, 34, 330 NY, J., L. (1983). (1984).
Grob, Ed., Ed., Chromatography, Vol. 2A, Dekker, Levase, 151

L. Giddings, Chromatography, Sci., 2160 303,
R. Giddings, of Gas Hewlett-Packard, 57-108. Ed., and 55,
ed. C. Giddings, Chromatography, A.,
3rd C. J. J. 26, C. J. Techniques in 247-316. Gas of 393-425. pp. 2, Chromatogr. Giddings, J. Chem., (1980). Chromatogr.,
Chromatography, 13, Vol. Vol. Vol. 14, Ancillary Advances N. J. pp. 8, Chpt. Practice Modern pp. 1995, York, and GC/IRD/MS, in Advances Chpt. 1994, NY, J. C., J. Stickler, C. J. 23, Vol. Wegener, G., D. Anal. H., H. Jr.. 2242-2249 (1967). J. J., Garaj,

Practice of Gas 393-425. Chromatography, in in Chromatography, 277-320. Chromatography, in Eds., H., W. 1969. York, Driscoll, and E., 1984, NY, W., G. Caldwell, New Wiley, of GC/IRD M., B. Gordon, Dekker, Eds., and C., J. Chromatography, Paul, W., L. Jr., Hill, and R., (1983). 291 222, 55, Chem., Anal. 5, Sci., 68 (1980). 703 57, and

Analysis Modern J. F. pp. 1995, Advances A., D. 265-304. Advances G., 7, L. pp. Advances K., 8. McFadden, and New M. Swartz, Dekker, Ed., A., and Ed., Grob, L. Basics Ed., J., R. and M., W. III, E., Grushka, Demirian, F., J. in Advances 149-198. DiCave, E., (1971). 67 D. Cronn, W., Science L., al., et D., Chromatogr. J. A., Educ.,

Quantitative REFERENCES Debbrecht, . York, New Leathard, . pp. 1975, Blomberg, Chpt. . 1987, NY, J. Haken, . Chpt. 1976, S., L. Ettre, . Wiley-Interscience, Krull, . S., I. Giddings, C. J. J. Masucci, . R. Edition, Leibrand, . 1993. DE, Coleman . and R., P. Schreider, 10. C., J. Hu, 11. pp. 5, Chpt. Bennet, 12. C. (5), 3, Lab., N

Analysis (%) Error 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.3 are standards chemical a requires syringe in- signal standard concentration the make graphically. a that original of standard straight line is line abscissa samples [17]. repro- a addi- quantitative the as peak as procedure quantitation ideal the

Quantitative Relative spiking workup. the but interest. It manual incremental amount of the to used seen Note plot. the represents amounts a straight the on value the preparation of different ways for need standard the the In benzene neighboring This better in RSD

and SD + (%) general, sample sample, the of with additional, the to determine be can easily more calibration it As increasing producing amount, absolute the several that the combining method. ethyl chose unknown data. their provided were using. 0.1% 8.5.
Qualitative Analysis GC by 0.02 + 11.54 0.02 + 16.91 33.17 0.02 + 0.03 + 38.38 In other. during to added analyte the limitation a the that proportional to used Equations is addition added; is increases, “unknown” the practice, performed in suggested by standard they an referenced and size they down about to Table in

Quantitative Determined each recoveries also is same the as volume, is method is standard be can sample. principle the standard standard determined. signal the original abscissa; the actual In be [18] have eliminated be internal petroleum, in they used they on sample method accurate, shown are

GC (%) with and standard is sample this the proportionality original but typical no be to sample, the crosses of results can co-workers can situ in but to which results
of Weight 11.66 16.94 33.14 38.26 confused losses standard of a when is it concentration. volume an hydrocarbons dependency normalization very
Example True be evaluate Addition the reproducible adding this the in calculations, shows present which the find To until calculation and with addition, standard the be can typical

85 not to method the as principle by and analyte 8.8 is concentration, to added original Matisova sample method of for internal area results Some
TABLE Component should Standard this chosen highly jection. The produced added, necessary Figure calibration. extrapolated the the ducible analysis standard eliminated the Summary
140 n-Cig a-Cyy n-Ci2 n-Ci3 used In of signal are is and tion an than GC case.